Magico A3 price increases 50%+


I have been doing a bit of research in my search for a new Loudspeaker upgrade .
since 2018 The Magico A-3 has gone up from $10k to $15k in 3 years That is dramatic .
and that doesnot even include the better feet they are a $1500 option . They are a good speaker but no longer the great deal they once were , and their Xover uses the low cost Average at best ,
Mundorf Evo capacitors, when they should have at least Mundorf Supreme , and Mundorfs cheapest $2 
Green resistors, the M-resist are only $13 retail  they get over $50% off them in a $15 k speaker going cheap? Having done Xover mods for years . If I find a good used pair ,I will use the Excellent VH audio Odam capacitors , and superb Path audio resistors which are noticeably better then even in their best speakers ,which use Mundorf supreme silver gold oil capacitors  which I have used several times  in the past.


128x128audioman58
Unless you have spent years and 1,000s of hours listening 
And comparing parts quality then you speak out of blind ignorance 
Period ,I will waste no more time On guys that barely can figure out how to hook up a cable .decisions are based mainly on compromises on average rule of thumb $25%  or less goes into the complete build the rest overhead and markup.,  ,that is why for example you are not going to put $1k into the Xover parts ,maybe 
now you can figure out why the speaker can be far superior $$.
@audioman58 

So @henry201 doesn't build or modify speakers, so that makes his opinion worthless? How arrogant of you. He has a valid point. I had a good friend who modified a perfectly nice sounding pair of Starsound Caravelles with every boutique part he could come up with. Completely ruined the sound of that speaker. Yes some speakers can be improved upon, but that's not the case every time. And you seem to think everything can be.

Sometimes it's best to buy a speaker that you love the sound of and not one that you really, really like, but hope to make better.
     The Veblen effect is also called the OREO effect, because when the inventor of this cookie, Hydrox saw the efect on sales, the price was lowered.  To counter, OREO raised its price to make Hydrox seem less valuable.    Hydrox has no animal fat.  OREO uses lard and other animal fat, but because it costs more, People see OREO as better.     Many psychology experiments confirm this bias.  Jewelry pricing is the epitome of the use of this bias.
     Maybe the speakers will not actually sound better, but people will think they do. After all, how can a $10,000 speaker possibly sound as good as a $15,000 one?
@danvignau 


Oreo's taste MUCH better than Sunshine Hydrox.  My mother bought Hydrox because they were cheaper and they tasted like it.
stereo5  We are all brought up to love the taste of animal fat, precisely because of conditioning.  Yes, a part of this conditioning is our fatty diet, but many studies show that pricing affects the perception of quality, even when the items are reversed as a control.  Whether you prefer OREO or HYDROX, the company intentionally priced OREO to foment that perception.  You might not like OREO if it were the one that cost more. I felt cheated when my Mom bough HYDROX.  This feeling had to affect my perception.