Nirvana sued over "Nevermind" cover photo

Wow!!!

https://www.9news.com/article/entertainment/music/nirvana-nevermind-baby-sues-band/507-1ef6065b-fa34...

mofimadness08-25-2021 6:09pm

...
56 posts total
View entire discussion

big_greg Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 6,728 posts 08-27-2021 at 05:31pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete It's problematic if the photo was used without the parents permission or any kind of release, but waiting 30 years to make an issue of it and claiming it's "pornography"... good luck.
mofimadness OP Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 5,796 posts 08-27-2021 at 06:15pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Is there and if so, what is the Statute Of Limitations on something like this?
barts Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 775 posts 08-28-2021 at 01:41pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete There is no federal statute of limitations on child pornography, meaning the feds can step in at any time after the fact. Also, federal law does not require any type of sex act, the simple picture of anyone under 18 and graphically naked is enough to satisfy breaking the law. Furthermore any person who knowingly purchases the image is breaking the law as well. State laws vary wildly. Maybe time to buy a white sleeve and pitch the offending one. LMAO. Regards, barts
barts Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 775 posts 08-28-2021 at 01:50pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Another interesting angle: If this is actually adjudicated as child porn then what about Qobuz (for instance) showing the album cover when you play the album. Is that distributing child porn? Regards, barts
mofimadness OP Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 5,796 posts 08-28-2021 at 04:07pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Thank you for the explanation. I'm not an attorney, nor do I play one on TV. :-)

56 posts total
View entire discussion

More to discover