Nirvana sued over "Nevermind" cover photo

There is no federal statute of limitations on child pornography, meaning the feds can step in at any time after the fact.  Also, federal law does not require any type of sex act, the simple picture of anyone under 18 and graphically naked is enough to satisfy breaking the law.

Furthermore any person who knowingly purchases the image is breaking the law as well.

State laws vary wildly.  Maybe time to buy a white sleeve and pitch the offending one.   LMAO.

Regards,
barts  

Another interesting angle:  If this is actually adjudicated as child porn then
what about Qobuz (for instance) showing the album cover when you play the album.  Is that distributing child porn?

Regards,
barts

Thank you for the explanation.   I'm not an attorney, nor do I play one on TV.  :-)

He’ll probably get a nuisance payout just to make him go away.
Takes all kinds nowadays.

Which reminds me: my dad submitted a photo of my mom sitting on a park bench holding me up as I stood on the ground (in my diapers!) for a scene from Route 66, which they ended up using. He was an editor at Columbia back then. Maybe I can get a lawyer......

All the best,
Nonoise