How long does Class A have?

@sgreg1,
Spot on.

There is no point in engaging. They pull out phrases like “free speech”, “censorship”, “right to an opinion” etc. It’s sad that these people are unable to pull themselves out from under their feelings of being disenfranchised. So many who where made promises to when they were young, promises that never came true. The “Elite” and educated are to blame. That is who is holding them back. The great conspiracy is what held them back. Not the fact they were sold a bill of goods, and they never had what it takes. At the core of this is their need to feel relevant. That they are above all the rest, seeing a truth that we are incapable of seeing for our selves. They live in an imaginary place where they are the gatekeepers, and we are the “sheep”. Sad really. People are very much allowed to have their own opinions, and to state them. However, not all opinions are of equal value. Some opinions are so misinformed that they are indeed dangerous. Opinions are like asses. We all have them, we need them. Many, however are full of $hl1.

""The List" - Scientists who Publicly Disagree with the Current Consensus on Climate Change - Electroverse" https://electroverse.net/the-list-scientists-who-publicly-disagree-with-the-current-consensus-on-cli...

@sgreg, very perceptive.  The rich run the world for their own benefit.  Did you think that up by yourself?

""The List" - Scientists who Publicly Disagree with the Current Consensus on Climate Change - Electroverse"

Pretty short list compared to the thousands who say otherwise! Apparently the electroverse site is not regarded as much more than a haven for crackpots:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/electroverse/
For cases like this, Occam's Razor is a handy tool for wading thru messes (she said he said) like this.  Here is one 'scientist' claiming:
https://electroverse.net/the-next-30-years-will-be-cold-says-climate-scientist-dr-willie-soon/
but then we find out that he's got some interesting funding, as reported by the Guardian 6 years ago or so:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/21/climate-change-denier-willie-soon-funded-energy-...
When you see something like this, the more complex explanation is that despite all the evidence to the contrary and the money being paid to him by big oil and political groups with an agenda that he's telling the truth. The simpler explanation is he's paid to lie. Occam's Razor is handy for things like this.