Are all amps being built wrong?


The power amplifiers that drive our loudspeakers are mostly built as a low impedance voltage source. They have always been ... but why?

Loudspeakers have a (greatly) varying impedance over the frequency range. A current drive amplifier would eliminate the issues that stem from this varying impedance, and at the same time make discussions about esoteric speaker cables that strive for optimal R, C, L superfluous. Although there still would be these un-measurable ’this (very expensive) cable sounds better’ debates and opinions ... and that’s OK, that’s part of the fun. :)

So ... why are amplifiers not built as a high impedance current source?

This is an interesting read: https://www.current-drive.info/
rudyb
Post removed 
Bob Carver made amps under the Sunfire brand that had speaker outputs selectable for voltage or current drive. I’m told the current drive was created by the insertion of a series resistor. 
Translate
**As we all know our speakers suffer from very low sensitivity,,,and the music consequently is only heard in bits and pieces,,,we need alot lot more power to drive our Wilson's, Vandersteens, Thiels,. Tektonics, Magnepans**

BS…
My 100W SS and then the 100W tunes powered my Vandersteens fine.Or maybe nit the PSE died 16 years in, and the VTLs 15 years later, and the latest one and a NAD before that worked fine.
I would not trade them except for a 36 year new version. And even then maybe not.
But the OP has a point about current.
Speakers with a more uniform impedance, would get a more uniform current at a fixed voltage. Maybe there is something in it?Or
We fix wild impedance swings with a current source amp? 
When I was doing some research, I came across a comment in one of the Coda related Audiogon threads that states Coda makes the Sanders Magtech amp; but, Sanders than tweaks it for use on their ESL speakers.