Tang Band 2145 in action

"WOW
I was listening to the bass YT vid only via the top FR section of my $20 computer speakers,,,I decided to flip over the down firing sub portion, which houses a 3 inch woofer.
Now we are talking
Please do the same to REALLY hear these guys in action on Timipini bass."

OK & Wow...

I'm looking for $30 sub/satellite computer speakers in order that I can truly appreciate your incredible implementation of single driver speakers via your YT videos (which otherwise sound like crap).

Makes perfect sense to do so (and it's cheap).

DeKay

So far I’m the only one here who actually heard the TB2145

You have the attention span of a gnat. Bache is the one that told you about them and he has told you how to improve it. He actually designs speakers and has a clue what he is doing. You don’t. You also have @larryi trying to help you get better sound as well. You dismiss everything he says because it doesn’t line up with what you wish you had. Not what you have, what you wish you had.

I think its clear the shootout went very well for the WBers.

Well, maybe to one of us. Your 10 of 10 on the tympany drums is your opinion. For the power of an instrument like that, the sound needs to have depth and project size. Sorry, but they don’t rate above about a 5 for me with respect to how those drums sounded. Sorely lacking the power and scale they should have.

I don't think, Mark Audio holds up against the Tang band and DavidLouis

On what do you base this? Which Mark Audio driver have you heard? Just more inane rambling.

You have got to be kidding.  Even my computer speakers were unable to  "dummy down" the horrible sound of those low-end drivers.

Really, really bad!  I would not put them in my car audio system, or even the car audio system in my children' cars.
Bow-wow, wooooooof!!!

Makes perfect sense to do so (and it's cheap).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Correct
I was listening via the pair of 1.5 inch full range,,sounded ok,,then i  fliped over the sub 3 inch woofer module,,a nd now the bass can be heard much better.
Its far from acutal presence, but gives an idea and smashes the long held notion , myth that WBers  lack some bass extention.
Which may very well have been true with the old dated technology/designs, Lowther and Fostex.
Which is why I distinguish old tech vs new high te4ch.
= Not the same.
Big improvements have been achieved.

Another dis-information that needs to be canceled out.
All WBers are about equal/the same.
Completely not true.
We have garbage
OK/acceptable with issues
Then we have the true Sopranos and Tenors.

I only am interested in the very finest offerings, Sopranos/Tenors. 
Nada mas.

You have the attention span of a gnat. Bache is the one that told you about them

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I do suffer froma  bit of alzheimers disease,,,but yeah I am glad we have a  Tang band2145 on board here. Maybe he could chime in on his opinion of that speakers solid bass.


Yes larry and I are in agreement. Adding/padding bass with your fav woofer is a stunning success.
Just don't go too high on the midwoofer is the only requirement,,, all Midwoofers suffer over say 1600hz range,, = breakup.


Tweets also, 6khz is OK, most  good tweets can easily go down to 6k,,I'm crossing at 9kish hz with my paper tweeter. Sounds fantastic with more ambience on the highs..
As larry mention, you have the purists, some did not care for added tweet, each his own.
For large orch, = the more the better. 
Of course your Vandersteen, Wilson's , many other xover types will blow away the 8 WBer in terms of depth , and power of the Timipi drums, 
No contest.