Vicdamone, thanks for the contribution. Writing a good long post takes time and often is not appreciated.
Of course, choosing the right type of connection is essential for achieving a seamingless integration between subwoofer and the main speakers. (My sub has both types of connections, i.e. high level and low level. I use the high level one because this is what the manual recommends.) However, while essential, choosing the right type of connection does not guaranty a successful integration.
The main point I am/was making in this thread is that the position of the subwoofer in the room is really essential, viz. interference patterns depends very sensitively on the relative position of the sound sources, i.e. sub and reflecting walls (which need not necessarily be the walls of the room where the sub is). Interference really has nothing to do with the type of correction one uses (low or high level inputs). Also, while not a bad argument, the fact that pro subs most often do not have a high level input is not that relevant (IMO). This can be pure commodity :).
The second point I made in this thread is that electronic equalization is important. Here we fully agree. Most often, even after carefully optimizing the position of the speakers and subwoofer, one still has a few frequencies that are excited (or partially canceled) by the room. Having the ability to tame down or pump up a little very specific modes can make all the difference in the world. (In this regard REL is definitively lacking a very important and essential feature. I believe you were referring to REL in your post, right? Fortunately, I can use my Accuphase DG-38 voicing equalizer to address this issue.) However, I firmly believe that electronic equalization should be done only after optimizing everything else - trying to even out peaks and valleys of 10 dB or more without adjusting the crossover, volume and position of the sub in the room is wrong.
Best wishes,
Paul