simply try both, pick your preference.
my phono eq experiences:
main system:
had AT120 TT with switchable built in 'dinky' phono eq.
had McIntosh C28 SS Preamp, with phono stage, presumable better, right?
I preferred the dinky AT phono, sold the C28.
bought a vintage McIntosh Tube Tuner/Preamp, much prefer it's phono eq. Changed TT, arms. cartridges, love the mx110z's phono eq, thus use a SUT for MC so I can still use the mx110z's MM Phono EQ.
.................................
Office System:
added a TT with MM. Needed Phono EQ.
bought Cambridge Duo. did NOT like it.
bought a Pyle $14. phono eq, to use while looking for something better. Sounded darn good, sent the Cambridge back.
Changed to a Luxman with both MM and MC built-in. Prefer it, gave the Pyle to a friend.
my phono eq experiences:
main system:
had AT120 TT with switchable built in 'dinky' phono eq.
had McIntosh C28 SS Preamp, with phono stage, presumable better, right?
I preferred the dinky AT phono, sold the C28.
bought a vintage McIntosh Tube Tuner/Preamp, much prefer it's phono eq. Changed TT, arms. cartridges, love the mx110z's phono eq, thus use a SUT for MC so I can still use the mx110z's MM Phono EQ.
.................................
Office System:
added a TT with MM. Needed Phono EQ.
bought Cambridge Duo. did NOT like it.
bought a Pyle $14. phono eq, to use while looking for something better. Sounded darn good, sent the Cambridge back.
Changed to a Luxman with both MM and MC built-in. Prefer it, gave the Pyle to a friend.