I cannot say that it is impossible to upgrade my system for 500 bucks...
It is very possible...
But i dont know with what and how at the time being.....This is a low amount of money not sufficient to beat most of my relatively well embedded components actual S.Q. significantly now...
It is possible for sure, but i dont know how to do it and i dont know which components will be way better than mine at this 500 bucks price level....
Something exist that can do it , unbeknown to me, but i dont bother to look after it.... I listen instead in awe to my next to 10,000 cd and music files..... :)
Music has NEVER be so good in all my life compared to any system i ever listen to with my friends....Be it a Tannoy system, a Quad system, or a Magnepan system...Acoustic science can improve anything to a very high level unbeknonwst to most...Remember that what people call "tweaks", AKA secondary artefacts even if they are costly sometimes, thiese embeddings devices controls which are for me ESSENTIAL, more sometimes than the choice of any component, then instead of being secondary they are primordial for reaching top S.Q. with any relatively good components....They are not "tweaks" in the usual meaning of this word in audio thread, like a slight addition to an already very good system in the mind of most people...
My embeddings controls are so powerful to improve S.Q. of my system then calling them "tweaks" made no sense to me....No sellers of costly gear will never admit that truth.... Anyway for example, for any speakers at any price the acoustic passive and active controls make a world of difference.... But you cannot sell 100,000 bucks speakers and says to the customer that he will never listen to them really save if reorganized acoustically his room....😁😊People buy components upgrade to solve a problem not to create a new difficult one... And acoustic was a tough nut to crack with one year of listening experiments for me, few hours each day....You know what i means? most people prefer to buy a new pair of speakers.... More easy....
My device controls are not secondary element "tweaks" compared to the primary components.... A mechanical equalizer can synergyze the relation between any speakers and room by a modification of the zones pressure of the room.... Is it a tweak? No it is an absolutely indispensable tool for a bad square small room like mine... My speakers are repleacable and upgradable....But my mechanical equalizer will stay in my room, i will only mechanically adjust it for the new speakers properties and workings in my specific room....
Give me 15,000 bucks and i am sure that it will be an upgrade if i change my 3 components....
From under 500 bucks to 15,000 bucks upgrade, this necessary move could give to people here an idea about the power of embeddings controls in the three working dimension of a low cost audio system....
But after 20 years of dream about Hi-FI, and my retirement from work, but no money to buy what i would have bought , i had 8 years ago only dreams...
My journey begins with a small step in modifications of all my 7 pairs of headphones 8 years ago.... I succeed... But my system is so good now that i never listen to any headphones now even my Stax one.... That gives you an idea....
Creating a good audio system dont cost money, it takes listening experiments....Thats all.....
It is very possible...
But i dont know with what and how at the time being.....This is a low amount of money not sufficient to beat most of my relatively well embedded components actual S.Q. significantly now...
It is possible for sure, but i dont know how to do it and i dont know which components will be way better than mine at this 500 bucks price level....
Something exist that can do it , unbeknown to me, but i dont bother to look after it.... I listen instead in awe to my next to 10,000 cd and music files..... :)
Music has NEVER be so good in all my life compared to any system i ever listen to with my friends....Be it a Tannoy system, a Quad system, or a Magnepan system...Acoustic science can improve anything to a very high level unbeknonwst to most...Remember that what people call "tweaks", AKA secondary artefacts even if they are costly sometimes, thiese embeddings devices controls which are for me ESSENTIAL, more sometimes than the choice of any component, then instead of being secondary they are primordial for reaching top S.Q. with any relatively good components....They are not "tweaks" in the usual meaning of this word in audio thread, like a slight addition to an already very good system in the mind of most people...
My embeddings controls are so powerful to improve S.Q. of my system then calling them "tweaks" made no sense to me....No sellers of costly gear will never admit that truth.... Anyway for example, for any speakers at any price the acoustic passive and active controls make a world of difference.... But you cannot sell 100,000 bucks speakers and says to the customer that he will never listen to them really save if reorganized acoustically his room....😁😊People buy components upgrade to solve a problem not to create a new difficult one... And acoustic was a tough nut to crack with one year of listening experiments for me, few hours each day....You know what i means? most people prefer to buy a new pair of speakers.... More easy....
My device controls are not secondary element "tweaks" compared to the primary components.... A mechanical equalizer can synergyze the relation between any speakers and room by a modification of the zones pressure of the room.... Is it a tweak? No it is an absolutely indispensable tool for a bad square small room like mine... My speakers are repleacable and upgradable....But my mechanical equalizer will stay in my room, i will only mechanically adjust it for the new speakers properties and workings in my specific room....
Give me 15,000 bucks and i am sure that it will be an upgrade if i change my 3 components....
From under 500 bucks to 15,000 bucks upgrade, this necessary move could give to people here an idea about the power of embeddings controls in the three working dimension of a low cost audio system....
But after 20 years of dream about Hi-FI, and my retirement from work, but no money to buy what i would have bought , i had 8 years ago only dreams...
My journey begins with a small step in modifications of all my 7 pairs of headphones 8 years ago.... I succeed... But my system is so good now that i never listen to any headphones now even my Stax one.... That gives you an idea....
Creating a good audio system dont cost money, it takes listening experiments....Thats all.....