+1 mahgister, yes the evidence continues to grow in favor of your assessment, so long as you’re actually taking the time to listen to distinct sources from individuals, and not mass media propaganda.
- ...
- 1008 posts total
To make thinking a start for brainwashed TV onlooker.... Read part 7 about the "fact checker" dogs paid by corporations .... https://trialsitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/McLachlan-86-Pct-Vax-Events-are-Related-to-Vaccine-2.pdf |
All this crisis remind me about the same half-truths and ignorance but in audio thread.... When i dreamed about hi-fi 8 years ago.... Most thread posters wanted to sell me the last electronical piece of costly gear for the ONLY solution to Hi-FI experience.... I cannot afford ANY of it.... I decided to experiment with low cost simple solutions...With low cost very good basic gear.... After a few years of listening experiments, i discovered for myself the simple truth... Hi-fi experience is possible at low cost modulo CONTROLS over the three working dimensions of an audio system: mechanical,electrical and especially acoustic... I never read reviews of new products now because i dont need to... And i never read official news to understand the actual health and world crisis for the same reason... Most people fall for half truths...It is easier to live with them then working our own ass to discover the complete truth.... I have teach reading analysis for 35 years , it serves me well.... |
Part 7 says that Tucker Carlson is asking important questions about Covid. That’s all I need to know about that. Also this entire "thesis" is an extrapolation of 13 deaths out of 250 a laughably small sample size. I am not a scientist and can blow holes in this thing without trying if you believe that garbage it’s because you want to believe it. Also the author Dr Scott Mclachlan is a Dr alright, Dr of computer science not even a medical doctor or virologist. |
First mentioning ANECDOTALLY a TV host is no reason to threw a science paper in a basket with a gesture of temper...( save for politically TV programmed mind) Second The entire article is about this : " This report presented information derived from analysis of the first 250 COVID-19 vaccine related deaths" not 13 deaths.... In all these 250 deaths only 13 are from allergic reaction the other causes of deaths are in very high probabilities related to the vaccines...The article authors ask for a more complete analysis of all cases and will do.... Vaccines may kill by other means than immediate allergic reaction...you dont know that? Then your answer is a desesperate answer with falsification of the analysis truth to serve your political BIAS.... Anyway your brain is probably foggy because of the 6 authors about a statistical analysis report about vaccines adverse events it is mandatory to have among the writers at least ONE specialist in statistic and informatic...Then mentioning this fact about one writer, among the 6, against this analysis is stupidity or bad faith.... Pick the reason you wanted to.... https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837543_Analysis_of_COVID-19_vaccine_death_reports_from_the_Vaccine_Adverse_Events_Reporting_System_VAERS_Database_Interim_Results_and_Analysis It is more easy to pick holes in your posts than to pick fleas on a never washed dog.... |
- 1008 posts total