Part 7 says that Tucker Carlson is asking important questions about Covid. That’s all I need to know about that. Also this entire "thesis" is an extrapolation of 13 deaths out of 250 a laughably small sample size. I am not a scientist and can blow holes in this thing without trying if you believe that garbage it’s because you want to believe it. Also the author Dr Scott Mclachlan is a Dr alright, Dr of computer science not even a medical doctor or virologist.
- ...
- 1008 posts total
First mentioning ANECDOTALLY a TV host is no reason to threw a science paper in a basket with a gesture of temper...( save for politically TV programmed mind) Second The entire article is about this : " This report presented information derived from analysis of the first 250 COVID-19 vaccine related deaths" not 13 deaths.... In all these 250 deaths only 13 are from allergic reaction the other causes of deaths are in very high probabilities related to the vaccines...The article authors ask for a more complete analysis of all cases and will do.... Vaccines may kill by other means than immediate allergic reaction...you dont know that? Then your answer is a desesperate answer with falsification of the analysis truth to serve your political BIAS.... Anyway your brain is probably foggy because of the 6 authors about a statistical analysis report about vaccines adverse events it is mandatory to have among the writers at least ONE specialist in statistic and informatic...Then mentioning this fact about one writer, among the 6, against this analysis is stupidity or bad faith.... Pick the reason you wanted to.... https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837543_Analysis_of_COVID-19_vaccine_death_reports_from_the_Vaccine_Adverse_Events_Reporting_System_VAERS_Database_Interim_Results_and_Analysis It is more easy to pick holes in your posts than to pick fleas on a never washed dog.... |
You are right about that....I apologize they are all statisticians but that does not invalidate their analysis...Sorry... An analysis of a statistical report needs more of statisticians than doctors.... The number of deaths associated to this new vaxx technology is there to be seen by analysis... You cannot infer from correlations to causation here without a statistical analysis ..... The suppression of treatment by censorship campaign for promoting only vaxx is a fact... read that: No relation bewtween covid increase and vaccination? https://trialsitenews.com/population-wide-epidemiological-geography-demonstrates-vaccination-doesnt-correlate-to-reduction-in-sars-cov-2-infection/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7 Are these many thousands doctors across the world totally deluded? https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/thousands-of-medical-professionals-declare-covid-policies-crimes-against-humanity/article_e2863f70-2074-11ec-8212-abe09d13e222.html Are there no CENSORSHIP ordered by big corporations? https://globalcovidsummit.org/news/yale-epidemiologist-risch-dismayed-over-hydroxychloroquine-media-attacks https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/indias-ivermectin-blackout/article_e3db8f46-f942-11eb-9eea-77d5e2519364.html |
@mahgister - In a news document I just read, As Adverse Reactions to Covid ‘Vaccines’ Reach 400,000, the Truth Must Be Spread Widely. One comment that I read, 321 million vaccinated in the US, 6985 deaths from vaccine reactions. We are now losing 2000 a day from Covid19. I must admit if these statistics are even remotely accurate, or even close to the whole story, the comment in favor of vaccines despite deaths caused by them is an interesting gamble. Of course, natural immunity changes drastically such a gamble, especially if natural immunity is indeed significantly superior to mRNA Vaccines. I’m still not eager to take the jab. |
- 1008 posts total