Choosing to not take the vaccine is a privilege and one that obviously comes at a cost.How "cute" from you is this way to present a complete irrational epidemiological decision which was push upon us by our dear corporations and which cost the well living of thousands and thousands of people.... Your "privilege" ressemble the totalitarian offered choices.... You lack if not of brain at least what is call heart or empathy.... |
you are of course free to get another job, move to another state if you wish that’s freedom. Choosing to not take the vaccine is a privilege and one that obviously comes at a cost. Ignorance. As if it is the employer’s free choice. As if it would be legal even if it were! As if there is even a shred of science or logic behind any of this! For the first time in history all of science is being utterly disregarded, as if there is no longer any such thing as naturally acquired immunity. We have laws in this country, the ADA for one, that specifically prohibits this sort of discrimination. Please, I know your head is stuffed full of MSDNCBS but please please please do try and put brain in gear before releasing clutch on keyboard! |
It is in fact perfectly legal and science is not being utterly disregarded and having conditions of employment are totally normal. There is nothing irrational about taking a life saving vaccine what's irrational is not taking the vaccine and acting like it's a conspiracy against you. And sorry not taking the vaccine does not make you disabled not sure how the ADA applies? |
The Nuremberg Code Makes 10 Declarations There are ten points to the code, which was published in the section of the verdict entitled “Permissible medical experiments”: 1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is a must. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. 2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. 3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. 4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. 6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. 7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. 8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
|
It is in fact perfectly legal and science is not being utterly disregarded and having conditions of employment are totally normal. There is nothing irrational about taking a life saving vaccine what’s irrational is not taking the vaccine and acting like it’s a conspiracy against you. And sorry not taking the vaccine does not make you disabled not sure how the ADA applies?Legal is not synonymus with legitimate... Bureaucratic corporate decisions are initiated most of the times by GREED not by science... The vaccine is proven to be not always life saving for all and the long term effect are unknown with a technology NEVER tested AT ALL in the long range... Read before typing words... There is no conspiracy against us, only a criminal cartel of corporations who lied about the existing treatment to promote only their costlier NEW vaxx for URGENCY reason and NO POSSIBLE TREATMENT supposedly ....No need to use "conspiracy" to deligitimate your opponent...Or using the word "antivaxxer".... If you had a light bulb illumination when reading about EARLY treatment efficacy and their suppression and about the complementary epidemiological function of early treatment and vaccination with an airborne mutating virus you would be less straight on your horse with unvaccinated people here ... The artificial division between vaxx and non vaxx is created articicially by this totalitarian stupid Mandate ... Are you able to think? Or you enjoy the division... Or you prefer the world divided in 2 parts with yourself "proud" to be in the right part...Like all sleepwalker... |
