No. It is a valid hypothesis. My guess is that your instinct to survive would override political motivation to stir up trouble where none exists.
Wow....
Instinct to survive?
No need to speak about what is at play here anymore...
Sorry your hypothesis make no sense....
And your reasoning about the decision to be vaxx or not to be vaxx, being only a politically motivated wise or unwise decision compared to the survival instinct is totally preposterous...
The decision to be vaxx or not is a complex risk calculus decision motivated and illuminated by ALL nemerous factors at play...
It is mostly and mainly a political decision only for dunces....
Then opposing political decision to instinct here is simplistic .....