sdl4,
Funny you should ask :-)
I’ve been going through just those experiments again.
I’m sure it will be room and listener dependent. My Thiel 2.7s are on a carpeted wood floor.
I have tried herbies footers, sliders, spikes, various forms of decoupling, isoacoustics footers, and finally even (expensive!) Townshend audio isolation bars (spring based).
In every case I found the sound to be "better" when the speakers were simply sitting directly on the carpeted floor. No spikes. Nuthin.’
The thing is one of the aspects I’ve been going for in my system is a sense of density palpability and impact. Not just the airy-fairy hologramsof many speakers, but a sense of instruments and voices having some acoustic power, moving air. In essence - the opposite of the electrostatic speaker sound :-)
Horn speakers tend to do this by nature, I find. But I can’t accommodate horn speakers (and not sure I’d fully get along with them anyway). So I’ve tried my best with regular box dynamic speakers. Thiels have a dense, focused sound. I find my CJ tube amps add yet another aspect of being filled out sounding, sometimes vinyl playback add yet more of this effect, and I play with room acoustics and speaker/listener arrangement to get there too.
Whenever I have decoupled the speakers from just sitting on the floor, whatever benefits there were have been outweighed by a change in the tonality away from what I like and find convincing in my speakers (usually footers/decoupling makes it a bit too dark sounding when decoupled) and a loss of density and impact.
The speakers may "disappear" a bit better, the sound may get a bit smoother etc, but the actual sense of realism and air-moving/room engaging impact takes a step back. I don’t want to take that step back.
So, that’s at least where I am, thus far.