On ''what there is''

😁😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

Gustave Giuliaume is the greatest, Goete is the greatest,
Goedel is also the greatest and Einstein also.
While we are comparing ''analog stuff'' to discover which is
the best we must recognise that statements like ''Peter is
the longest guy in the class but George is even longer'' make
no sense. There is also this Roman nonsense about ''primus
inter pares'' . This is accepted all over the world as Roman
''principle '' but how is it possible that all are equal ?
That is why Frege stated that ''subject'' and ''predicate''
as grammar categories are not suitable for the science. 
That is why he wanted to produce language suitable for
science. Regarding relational statement which presuppose
more ''subjects'' than one he proposed functions with two
or more arguments. If I am well informed this is used in
mathematics. Alas mathematics is my ''Achilles heel''. 















w

TIme to throw some Wittgenstein into the mix!

So many people with so many ideas...and none of them is any "wiser" in reality than any of the rest of us. A lot of time can be (and obviously is) wasted on the thoughts of others instead of our own. 
Not to say that there isn't value in the thoughts and discoveries of others, but if too much attention is paid to them, they may become the "gods" that some here so vehemently deny.

there are many Gods to pray to, the virtual system pages are a veritable graveyard of prayers made, promises kept and otherwise…..