Telling musicians to evaluate and choose their instruments in a “scientific” way?


How do you think this would go over?

“This mass produced guitar measures the same as your vintage Martin on my oscilloscope, so any difference you hear is just expectation bias.” “You need to do a double blind test to prove there’s a difference!” “Rosewood is rosewood, there’s no difference between this Brazilian that’s been seasoned for 20 years and that Indonesian that came off the boat a month ago, you’re being taken in!”

tommylion
It's the actual musician that makes an instrument sing, not how exclusive the instrument is. A better sounding instrument will  however, inspire the musician to play better.

A good player with a cheap guitar vs a hack with a very nice guitar will always draw  more attention.

“It's the actual musician that makes an instrument sing, not how exclusive the instrument is. A better sounding instrument will however, inspire the musician to play better.

A good player with a cheap guitar vs a hack with a very nice guitar will always draw more attention.”

Just like the best possible system you could put together with an unlimited budget wouldn’t be very appealing if you didn’t have any good music to play through it.
Tone is in your fingers. And your cables. And your fuses. And your amp. And your microphone. And the room conditions. And your equipment. And the stability of the power, cords and connections. And what media your using.....

As a guitar player myself, I like my tone to ooze from the speakers like liquid lava.

Where does it all end, man?!?!?!?!?!?