And tha man that posted that was also a contributor to the argument, so...
Sorry but your argument is a bit lacking 2 leg to walk properly...
An argument cannot EVER be reduced to the person who spoke about it...An argument is sound by itself or not in a string of arguments...
An argument is a fact or an error, or a lie, but must never be rejected because it was associated with the person who spell it...
Logic dont like strawman argument...
By the way it is easy to spot the greed pyramid controlling all corporate interests including so called fact chekers...If you cannot you lack computer skill to research...It take 10 minutes nowadays to LINK all enterprises on earth to 3 CEO more powerful than most states on earth...
Internet is totally destructive but also could be totally redemptive... It depend how we use it and who control it...
In our case the graph calculus relating all corporations on earth by way of weighted influences upon each other is an easy calculus... Try it...
A swiss neutral enterprise has already do all the job... But some others did it too...
A cue: Vanguard, Blackrock and i forget the third one...
No graph ever produce for sure by itself a conspiracy theory or ever promote it, it is just a "fact" to PONDER....
But if a pyramid of power exist, thinking that this pyramid will not act to preserve his interest is a bit "naive"....Is it a conspiracy?
I dont mind about the word used....Reality speak without words...
Now i will go back to Pat Martino music...I need it....
