Any piece of data must be used not like an argument in a war of insults but in a context..
This context crisis ask for relating each piece of data to others data...
But more important than data is common sense...
We cannot, being non experts, judge all data value by ourselves..
But we can read 2 opinions and reach a conclusion if the evidence is linked to others facts and others opinions than just only pure raw data...
For example Kary Mullis opinion about PCR use is of most value than Fauci opinion, he create this tech and never benefit from it...
For example Robert Malone opinionΒ creator of the mRNA vaccination is of most high value about this kind of vaxx or about this precise technology than Fauci...Who never practise medecine and was ONLY a bureaucrat commanding with Gates the most powerful research budget in medecine on earth... No scientist could say ill about Fauci and stay in the field .. NONE...
For example Luc Montagnier opinion about viruses is more credible than the opinion of Fauci the friend of the crook Robert Gallo in the aids fraud...
For example Michael Yeardon insider pfizer vice president of research opinion seems more valuable than Albert Bourla actual director of Pfizer...
And Sony Barger anyway the first Hells Angels president seems more credible than Albert Bourla discourse, guess why? but think before speaking....
For example we can awake ourself about the history of corruption in big pharma..
We can read the opinions of insiders from big pharma who are no more paid and confront what they are all saying...
We can think about the long history of epidemiology and see that there was never a confinement of the world population before INCLUDING the vast majority of healthy people at the cost to lost their livelyhood.....
Β