2. digital
  3. 1159044452

Suggestions for CD player $2-3k used?

I am looking for a CD player/source in the $2-3k range, used. primarily for Redbook CD playback. Other equipment consists of Aerial 9, McCormack DNA500 and VTL 5.5. I like players that have a coherent, natural sounding presentation and do not overemphasize any portion of the frequency spectrum. I do however like players that offer deep, detailed bass and lively dynamics, although I would prefer to stay away from players with on overly up-front or "in your face" presentation, and those that overemphasize the upper frequency range. Players I have considered include;
Meridian G08 (good reviews, like the looks but hate the remote)
Cary 303-300
Ayre CX7e (overly tipped up toward the high frequencies?)
Modded Sony or Denon players - Modwright?
Electrocompaniet EMC-1Up/mkll (does this compete with newer units?)
McCormack UDP-1 Deluxe
Resolution Audio Opus 21 (is this unit dynamic and detailed?)
Sim Audio Eclipse (older technology?)
and lower priced players;
Classe CDP-10 (could be a bargin?)
Sim Audio CD 5.3 (can't find out too much other than from mfg's website)
Any further insight on my choices, or other suggestions would be appreciated.
mitch2
tboooe's avatar
tboooe
1,009 posts
 
I second the vote for the Cary 303/300. I had this and recently upgraded to the 306. If you like the Cary house sound (warm, organic midrange) go for the Cary.
hartwerger
105 posts
 
coherent, natural sounding presentation and do not overemphasize any portion of the frequency spectrum -- I would say the Musical Fidelity A5 (not on your list obviously) fits this description. Very neutral and exceptionally balanced across the frequency spectrum. Offers deep clean bass as you also request, but I would not say the bass is excetionally prominent; if you like gut pounding bass, this is not the player for you. Clean dynamics. Oddly, it does not have the warmth you would expect from a tubed CD player; I wouldn't say its cold or clinical, but its not warm like many tube players I've heard. Although the A5 has gotten good reviews from the press, the audio forums have had more cautious comments; some really like it, some are indifferent. If you're looking for a natural, well balanced and musical player, the A5 warrants serious consideration. I have one and like it quite a bit, but do see how it would not be everyone's cup of tea. Hope that helps.
mlauner
250 posts
 
naim cd5x- very musical
raquel
841 posts
 
I just read this thread and see that you intend to go to a balanced preamp. Consider the Audio Research CD-3 or (CD-3 Mk. II). It is a truly differential-balanced design, and very "well-balanced" performer. The only warning is that it loads from the top. Here are reviews by Marc Mickelson and Wes Phillips (of Stereophile):

http://www.soundstage.com/revequip/audioresearch_cd3mkii.htm

http://www.onhifi.com/product/audioresearch_cd3.htm

I am biased because I own one, but if you want a balanced CD player and don't want to spring for Meitner-level digital gear, it is a good option.
mrtennis
3,295 posts
 
be careful about 24/192 upsampling players. i too have been looking for a cd player. ihave heard many. i bought a bat vk d5. it has 6 tubes. i intend to sell it shortly and am looking again fro a cd player. i would not buy any on your short list. i am considering a cec 51 xr.

most of the high resolution cd players are ruthless at revealing the flaws of a recording. i heard the ayre, the resolution audio and was not impressed.

i would just be very careful considering the cd players on your list, including the cary. my suggestion: audition before purchasing and have some soft sounding cables on hand in case you need them--perhaps, an equalizer too.
More to discover