LSA Voyager GAN Amplifier

I am aware that some of you complained about not enough bass. Don't know if they simply used the stock soft rubber feet, which IMO sucked a lot of life out of it: well I just uncovered it, taking my Voyager to a much higher level of enjoyment by simply replacing my 6 yo old+ Machina Dynamica springs under everything prior to buying the Nobs @~ $8/4, which have 7 springs in each. And they definitely improved the sound, but I started watching this thread: 

 Nobsound springs - load range, which is very informative about the amount of weight each spring is designed to handle.  Well, late yesterday I started pulling springs out, starting with 3 springs/3 Nobs under my Oppo 105 first (decent improvement). Today I got busy, starting with my LSA Voyager GaN 350 amp (OMG!), then my Audio Alchemy DDP-1 + PS 5 (here I only used 2 each X 3). This leaves my Core Power 1800 PLC, which currently has 4 Machina Dynamica springs, and eventually my EP 3.4 OB speakers, a 2 person job as they are currently on Harbor Freight dollies.

I am totally amazed. I now have authoritative bass- mid bass, which gives the music significantly more drive, putting a big smile on my face listening to Lyle Lovett The Road to Ensenada CD. One of my torture test CDs is Jennifer Nettles Playing With Fire. It's on as I write this. Where many of the songs sounded thin, so far it sounds natural, like she's in the room.

hth

I bought one Voyager GAN 350 on Nov 19,  but I listened the sound was disssapointed, I told Walter what I heard , but he just told it need burn in 200 Hrs.

I cannot accept the answer,    So I had do 9 days efforts to rebuild my Voyager GAN 350, improve its power wire, speaker wire, and got a dreamming Voyager GAN 350, not muffled again, it became bright, transparent, ......., more better than "Walter tweaked LSA Voyager", and not to burn in 200 Hrs, I think My adjustment was state of the art,  and no other voyager GAN 350 will be better than my owned "Voyager". 

It was refresing to see tweak1 post yesterday talking about his first hand experience with this amp. For a minute I was excited to see a 2nd post along the lines, but after reading it I checked it is the first post the user has made on a'gon...I guess here we go again...

FWIW some of us are interested in actual listening experience, and especially when people mention how it sounds vs other amps they know.

"FWIW some of us are interested in actual listening experience, and especially when people mention how it sounds vs other amps they know."👍

That's what I noted a couple of pages back.  It's never a good thing when someone has little or no knowledge about something but thinks they do.  There's no sense in getting into that debate. 

In addition, many moons ago, I had a Proceed AVP (when the model was current in my system).  It was easy to hook multiple digital cables from my Proceed PMDT.  I had someone hook them behind the system and didn't know the inputs used and they were also swapped periodically.  I had no knowledge of what particular cables were in what input and the person swapping had no knowledge of what I was selecting via the remote control.  I was always curious of how measurement/engineering types view digital cables.  I had a couple explaining to me that there were ones and zeroes traveling down the cable (I did my best not to laugh).  Anyway, I had a few of those over and we did listening and I asked them to pick which sounded better.  They all picked the same one and then when we compared notes between myself and the person swapping cables on paricular listening session numbers, they all wanted to dissect the preamp as there had to be hardware differences.  When I pointed out that the results already eliminated that possibility, they wouldn't accept the truth as to what they heard (I guess it was a conspiracy to them).  Moral of the story, even hearing differences, they wouldn't accept them.  So why would one argue with someone who hasn't heard something or compared it to something else?  Let alone, for the most part the facts they are basing a conclusion on are from a source of little to no value related to audio (it's pretty much like the story I got above that ones and zeroes were floating across the cable).

I also noted go start a thread on why a particular amp sucks and enjoy. I actually feel bad for them as it's kind of like the story of the emperor's new clothes.

What is the compliance of your springs? What frequency range are you attempting to attenuate? Are you overdamped? Underdamped? Critically damped? Do you know anything about damping harmonic motion? "it sounds better" is not evidence that you have done anything meaningful to reduce the vibrations in your components- heard of confirmation bias? It's how all these nut job tweaks and tweakers make a living fleecing people.

LOL---Machina Dynamica--

"Posted by geoffkait (M) on January 23, 2013 at 14:20:08
Machina Dynamica.
Obtain a roll of adhesive-backed copper tape, width 1/2 inch. It can be either conductive or non-conductive adhesive. Adhesive-backed copper tape is available at Amazon and eBay, Radio Shack might carry it, who knows. Cut the copper tape into 1" x 1/2" rectangles - one rectangle for every window pane or glass door in the house or apartment. Attach one copper rectangle to each glass window and glass door. The copper rectangle can be placed anywhere on the glass, upper corner or otherwise out of view is OK. Be sure and attach a copper rectangle to glass in all rooms of the house or apt."

This is the level of sophistication we are at with these tweakie scammers....