The Big Misconception About Electricity


This vid goes quite a ways down the road to explaining why:

1)  Power cords make a not so subtle difference.

2) Cable elevators should not be looked at askance.

 

Regards, barts

128x128barts

I expect this was another downfall of Tesla. So called photographic memories have been shown repeatedly to be flawed.

Your attack without foundation against a great human being are reflecting only your repulsive ego sorry...Bragging about yourself will not help you sorry...

eidetic memory exist..

Take a look, this case was studied by Oliver Sacks....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejhNxNIKvOI

This young man look at a city from the air and paint it exactly...

He did it MANY times with many cities...He did that for a living...

And educate yourself about Leonardo Da Vinci able to draw fluids movements like nobody before him, and try Goethe who create his morphology with an eidetic memory of his own capturing the movement of plant growth ...

Perhaps you know John Von Neumann... Also an eidetic memory..

Do you want other case?

 

 

Post removed 

Because it’s true?

Listen, you asked me question and I answered it.

If you are not mature enough to handle that answer, it isn't my fault...

Because he replied to your immodest bragging about yourself just after your disparagement and ignorance about Tesla....And about eidetic memory facts....

 

For a supposed adult, you have the maturity of a 3yr old. How else do you justify this comment you made?

Mathematics does not trump Reality. Reality does not bend to equations, equations that require magical objects like black holes, neutron stars, dark matter to explain what is being observed out in space.

Our equations don’t add up, ohhhhhh it’s not that our mathematical, unverified understanding of the fundamental forces of the universe is incomplete, no no no there must be this 99.9% of the universe that is completely invisible. Can’t be detected, can’t be interacted with, can’t be verified......but it MUST exist or our equations don’t balance out. And Gravitational equations are sacrosanct... can’t be challenged.

Anyone that dares to point out this fundamental contradiction.....is a nutcase.

 

A star is spinning out in space at the speed of a dentist drill, at least we think it is spinning, but no object that size can stay intact as explained by the theory of star formation. Hmmmmmm okay, instead of actually addressing the problem and modifying mathematical models to align with observation........we come up with an object sooooo dense, that it still stays intact spinning at those speeds. An object made of Neutrons, neutrons so densely packed together, that have never been observed in experiments, or anywhere else in nature, a phenomenon that violates all known laws of Nuclear physics. Attach it to a few new equations and off we go....

 

String theory and it’s 10 extra dimensions.....I don’t even need to go there.

This is what happens when you have Mathematicians sitting in their basements, dictating that reality conform to their theoretical models.

All inconvenient observations are filtered out, wild fairy tale objects are debated endlessly......Just another version of "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?"

Hey, but what do I know...all this has been debunked on a video on YouTube.....no need to pay attention. Move along, nothing to see here.