The Big Misconception About Electricity

The Electrical Universe cosmology is independent from Emmanuel Velikovsky’s work,

You are right about that, i never claim that all the electrical paradigm come from Velikovsky for sure...

In the last 50 years i see Velikovsky general claims about solar system REGULAR catastrophies, not details where he is wrong, confirmed by the general scientific view...

Crothers though does not seem to be a mathematician...

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Stephen_J._Crothers

Hey, I said credentialed, not qualified. However, to that, I will leave those far more knowledgeable to do it, which they have. They will accomplish in minutes what would take me days.

@yuviarora ,

I know you don't respect the "math", but let me try to explain it. I will not try to justify the fudge factor of dark matter, as that is not possible, but that is just one item in a long long list.

Mathematical proofs are a lot like statistics.

If I say y = a + b, and I do an experiment, and y does equal A + B, that provides me a very narrow interpretation of the physical world and even then, a narrow confidence in its universal accuracy or applicability.

A statistical equivalent would be flipping a coin 10 times. I can have some confidence in what the statistics indicate, but not a lot.

Now what if I flip the coin a billion times, or better yet, what if I flipped 20 coins, 1 trillion times. Now I can be confident that the results is accurate with only the most minor minor chance it is not.

Mathematical proofs / models are like that. When I take say 10 equations, perhaps with 10 variables, and 10 constants, and I apply them to a new problem and come up with an answer, and then I do an experiment, and the experiment matches my mathematical model, then there is a very very high chance that the math IS an accurate representation of the physical reality. The reason is based in statistics. The odds that those equations, and those variables and those constants, randomly coming up with the exact answer is exceedingly low. The grey area, is "exact" and it will vary based on what you are modelling. And here is where the statistical strength improves. Often the answer is not 1 things, but a whole set of things, and the odds of all of those things happening and the models coming up with them, and the models doing it by accident become even more exceedingly rare.

This is why the electric model fails. It is incomplete, and only works in isolation. There are hand waving explanations for things that happened, but no unified model that takes into account everything that happens and all the outcomes, and all the phenomena observed.

@yuviarora , obviously we have different standards for what "preeminent" means. Stephen Crothers is only preeminent in his own mind and with a small group of people unqualified to determine if he is or not. Pretty much everyone else thinks he is a quack.

@mapman, excuse me for bringing you into this, but I wanted to illustrate how you truly alienate people. I hope the mods will give me some latitude on this post.

This is what Stephen Crothers wrote to a fellow scientist for the simple act of not agreeing with him and thinking his work shoddy. Keep in mind, this is from Stephen himself.

He wrote this to close off a very long, professional and if you have any experience in these matters rather polite letter. It is here:  http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/letter-9.pdf

I must first apologise, as you for a gentleman I mistook. In all the email you sent me you included rude, arrogant, condescending, stupid, and insulting remarks. You have rightly earnt yourself a bloody nose, and if not for the distance between us I might well have visited you to deliver the causative blow, not because of your incompetent technical argument, but because your behaviour has been that of an arsehole. It seems that you are doomed to live and die a conceited shithead, and, moreover, a conceited shithead who cannot do even elementary geometry.

Stephen J. Crothers.

The mathematics of Standard Cosmology itself is extremely illogical and contradictory.. I posted Stephen Crother's critiques of the standard mathematical model and he cuts right to the heart of the issue. 

Most people will not have the time to watch it, but it is a brief summation of the existential challenges the standard model faces. Mathematics is a tool to explain what we see out in space, but it cannot replace common sense, logic, and observation itself. 

@mahgister yes, we are children playing with ideas that are too grand for comprehension, claiming authority and certainty where there is none.