The Big Misconception About Electricity


This vid goes quite a ways down the road to explaining why:

1)  Power cords make a not so subtle difference.

2) Cable elevators should not be looked at askance.

 

Regards, barts

128x128barts

I think cindyment is right about Einstein relativity ...

Einstein equations are not wrong ...

Like Newton equations were not wrong...

Like epicylcles equations were not wrong...

It lacked something essential to Ptolemeaus equations: the Copernic hypothesis about the place of Earth in relation with the sun..

In the same way it lack something to add to Einstein equation and Schrodinger equation for example, i think it lack a better understanding of life and his relation to consciousness..

But i am a poet not a scientist...

Sometimes poet are right though....

😁😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

But @yuviarora , set aside the electrical hypothesis, you are right about the essential:

We dont know much about the universe....

Those who think they know are deluded....Or mystic...

I respect mystics by the way....

 

@yuviarora , obviously we have different standards for what "preeminent" means. Stephen Crothers is only preeminent in his own mind and with a small group of people unqualified to determine if he is or not. Pretty much everyone else thinks he is a quack.

@mapman, excuse me for bringing you into this, but I wanted to illustrate how you truly alienate people. I hope the mods will give me some latitude on this post.

This is what Stephen Crothers wrote to a fellow scientist for the simple act of not agreeing with him and thinking his work shoddy. Keep in mind, this is from Stephen himself.

He wrote this to close off a very long, professional and if you have any experience in these matters rather polite letter. It is here:  http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/letter-9.pdf

 

I must first apologise, as you for a gentleman I mistook. In all the email you sent me you included rude, arrogant, condescending, stupid, and insulting remarks. You have rightly earnt yourself a bloody nose, and if not for the distance between us I might well have visited you to deliver the causative blow, not because of your incompetent technical argument, but because your behaviour has been that of an arsehole. It seems that you are doomed to live and die a conceited shithead, and, moreover, a conceited shithead who cannot do even elementary geometry.


Stephen J. Crothers.

The mathematics of Standard Cosmology itself is extremely illogical and contradictory.. I posted Stephen Crother's critiques of the standard mathematical model and he cuts right to the heart of the issue. 

Most people will not have the time to watch it, but it is a brief summation of the existential challenges the standard model faces. Mathematics is a tool to explain what we see out in space, but it cannot replace common sense, logic, and observation itself. 

@mahgister yes, we are children playing with ideas that are too grand for comprehension, claiming authority and certainty where there is none.   

 

@cindyment You have a habit to attacking people’s character instead of their arguments. Bad habit you have there. 

 

Galileo (was imprisoned for proving that the Earth is not the center of the Universe)… You would have probably nailed his front door shut with all the other tormentors. 

@cindyment You have a habit to attacking people’s characters instead of their arguments.

Bad habit you have.

 

Actually I attacked the "distinction" placed upon them, whether using the description "Physicist" or "Preeminent" when there is no objective reason I could find (or that actual physicists and preeminent mathematicians believe). It appears those titles are purely self given. As the distinction is the crux of the argument, calling it into question is not "attacking character".

 

The mathematics of Standard Cosmology itself is extremely illogical and contradictory.. I posted Stephen Crother’s critiques of the standard mathematical model and he cuts right to the heart of the issue.

I don’t perceive you to be a mathematician or physicist @yuviarora , so I can only assume you are repeating someone else’s words without giving reference. Most advanced math looks like gobbly good to 99.9% of the people on the planet.

 

It’s not the 16th century anymore @yuviarora . And now, to my previous post, we have the beauty of math and massive amounts of data. If Crother’s "theories" were so great, then he would be able to present a unified theory that would not only predict the things that happened in the universe, but would predict them with greater accuracy than the current models. There is no need for a PhD, or university post to do this. The science media is desperate for anything interesting to post. This is exactly what Crothers has not done, and exactly what the the Physicists who he wrote the nastygram to said to him. He actually said exactly that, that Crothers had not shown in any fashion that he had created a model that more accurately predicted current observations. This was factual and Crothers had a hissy fit. The "normal" reaction would be to go back and refine your model, apply it to current astrophysics problems, and show, with proof, that your model is better, by both having more accuracy, and applicability to more cases. Again Crothers did not and has not done that. That is what separates those people initially thought crazy from the one that continue to be thought crazy. They prove they are not.