{. . . } does not think bargains exist, they just think the expensive one is over priced. There is a difference.
precisely my thought. Its true that 'too good to be true' generally isn't rue, but let's be real - what do you think is inside that streamer? A computer. Maybe a NUC. Maybe a Pi. Maybe something else. A LPS, a nicely isolated SPDIF and USB interface. All well and dandy - bu you are paying a lot for it and the fancy faceplate (generally the fancy package is the single most costly part of any high end component, followed by power supplies).
Now, i do think that you ought to be comparing the price/cost to a NUC, +LPS, +isolation between the NUC and the USB I/F and if possible a separate power supply for the USB. +Excellent clock if SPDIF is used and in source master mode. That begins to add up. But not to $6k
The isolation may well exist at the DAC's input. Not all methods of isolation are created equal - i believe in using a transformer to fully isolate including split grounds. I have also found, and cannot explain, that even with most "isolated" USB inputs isolating the driving USB from the computer/Pi still makes a small, but real, difference. My only explanation is that the isolation is good, but imperfect.
I re-iterate that a 3- layer solution with server, bridge and DAC is my preference (Roon core, roon bridge, roon endpoint). It forces more isolation and moves heavy processing away from the audio signal (processing = power draw = power supply and ground noise).
The new Pi4s are leagues ahead of Pi3s in terms of USB bus powering BTW. Alas they still draw a LOT of power at startup, as do NUCs. Like 2+ and 4+ amps respectively. So actually i power the Pi in split mode - noisy side with SMPS and audio side with LPS (~< 0.5A)