The Big Misconception About Electricity


This vid goes quite a ways down the road to explaining why:

1)  Power cords make a not so subtle difference.

2) Cable elevators should not be looked at askance.

 

Regards, barts

128x128barts

‘Leaky’ Vaccines Can Produce Stronger Versions of Viruses

By studying chickens, researchers say they have proven the theory that more virulent viruses can evolve from so-called “leaky” vaccines.

 

Share on Pinterest

The current debate over vaccinating toddlers is small potatoes compared to the potential risks of using “leaky” vaccines to prevent disease.

According to a new study published today in the scientific journal PLOS Biology, some types of vaccines could allow more virulent versions of a virus to survive, putting those who are unvaccinated at greater risk of severe illness.

 

To understand this, it’s necessary to examine the difference between “perfect” vaccines and “leaky” ones.

Perfect vaccines are so-named because they mimic the perfect immunity that humans naturally develop after having certain childhood disease.

“When a vaccine works perfectly, as do the childhood vaccines for smallpox, polio, mumps, rubella and measles, it prevents vaccinated individuals from being sickened by the disease, and it also prevents them from transmitting the virus to others,” said Andrew Read, an author of the study and an Evan Pugh professor of biology and entomology and Eberly professor in biotechnology at Penn State University.

Read More: Vaccines Could Be the Answer for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis »

 

What We Learned from Chickens

Enter the chickens.

Read was studying vaccines that could combat malaria when he got interested in Marek’s disease, a highly contagious viral disease that affects chickens.

It’s a form of herpes that is found in chicken dander and is more virulent than the Ebola virus, Read said.

After experiments done in a specialized pathogen-containment facility at The Pirbright Institute in the United Kingdom, the researchers concluded that the vaccines developed to combat Marek’s disease were imperfect or leaky.

“These vaccines also allow the virulent virus to continue evolving precisely because they allow the vaccinated individuals, and therefore themselves, to survive,” said Venugopal Nair, who led the research team. He is the head of the Avian Viral Diseases program at The Pirbright Institute.

These less-than-perfect vaccines create a “leaky” barrier against the virus. Vaccinated individuals may get sick but have less severe symptoms, but the virus survives long enough to transmit to others, which allows it to survive and spread throughout a population.

“Our research demonstrates that the use of leaky vaccines can promote the evolution of nastier ‘hot’ viral strains that put unvaccinated individuals at greater risk,” Nair said.

Marek’s disease used to be a minor ailment that did little harm to chickens in the 1950s, but the virus has grown stronger and today is capable of killing all the unvaccinated birds in poultry flocks, sometimes within 10 days.

But since nearly every chicken in agricultural production throughout the world is vaccinated, Marek’s is a relatively minor problem today.

Read More: Vaccine for High Blood Pressure May Be in the Works »

 

Preventing More-Virulent Virus Strains

Marek’s is not the only nasty disease out there. The virus causing avian influenza can be even deadlier.

“The most virulent strain of avian influenza now decimating poultry flocks worldwide can kill unvaccinated birds in just under three days,” Read said, because the vaccine against avian influenza is a leaky one.

“In the United States and Europe, the birds that get avian influenza are culled, so no further evolution of the virus is possible,” Read said.

Culling is a more expensive process than using a leaky vaccine, he said. But it’s safer.

“Instead of controlling the disease by culling infected birds, farmers in Southeast Asia use vaccines that leak — so evolution of the avian influenza virus toward greater virulence could happen,” he added.

Some human deaths from avian influenza virus have been reported in China.

“We now are entering an era when we are starting to develop next-generation vaccines that are ‘leaky’ because they are for diseases that do not do a good job of producing strong natural immunity — diseases like HIV and malaria,” Read said.

What’s the answer?

Rigorous testing and vigilant monitoring of next-generation vaccines to prevent the evolution of more-virulent strains of viruses will help.

Read sees this as crucial to the current attempt to develop an Ebola vaccine. He notes that secondary techniques can help when using leaky vaccines, such as insecticide-treated bed nets for prevention of malaria.

 

 

Mareks Disease

Leaky vaccines promote the transmission of more virulent virus

Posted January 14, 2016

Not all vaccines prevent infection. Some, known as leaky vaccines, prolong host survival or reduce disease symptoms without preventing viral replication and transmission. Although leaky vaccines provide anti-disease benefits to vaccinated individuals, new research by CIDD’s Andrew Read, David Kennedy and colleagues at the Avian Oncogenic Virus Group in the United Kingdom, and The University of New England in Australia, has demonstrated that leaky vaccines can make the situation for unvaccinated individuals worse. Leaky vaccines work by enhancing host immunity to a particular pathogen, without necessarily blocking or slowing viral replication. The result is that infected but vaccinated individuals have extended survival, allowing highly virulent pathogen that would normally reach an evolutionary dead-end in a dead host, can transmit. The evolutionary consequences of high virulence are thus reduced and these pathogens can be selectively favored as a result of leaky vaccination. 

 

The researchers tested whether leaky vaccines could be a potential driver in the evolution of higher virulence in a system where evolution to high virulence of a virus infecting chickens has been rapidly observed since the introduction of vaccines in the 1980s.  The virus known as Marek’s disease virus, infects chickens worldwide, and with its climbing levels of virulence has been costing the industry over $2 billion/year in recent years.  Using an experimental setup to infect vaccinated and unvaccinated birds with viruses of different levels of virulence, Read and colleagues found that although vaccines reduced the concentration of virus shed by birds, by extending survival, vaccinated individuals shed cumulatively higher amounts of highly virulent virus. Similar results came from individuals that received maternal antibodies: immunity extended survival and increased the amount of the most virulent virus that could then be transmitted to unvaccinated individuals. These highly virulent strains that survived in vaccinated or immune-protected individuals were then shown to be lethal in unvaccinated individuals. The results suggest that disease interventions that aim to prevent disease symptoms without preventing transmission can have dangerous evolutionary consequences and need to be considered in cases with imperfect vaccines. The findings were published this month in PLoS Biology and can be accessed here. The video press release is also available here.

 

Synopsis written by Jo Ohm.

 

Synopsis written by Jo Ohm.

 

 

Your Peter Stoilov cannot be objective. the survival of his laboratory and his job depend for his money COMPLETELY of Fauci and Gates money...

If he said anything negative he lost all...

Montagnier, nevermind his age, in this crisis is at the front of this crisis, from the beginning, he is in close contact DAILY with all the scientists in this field... Guess why?

He is the FIRST who spell the truth about the fact now almost proved,  that the virus was artificially modified, and we know now  with Fauci money and benediction...It lack only the necessary official inquiry...It seems that you know nothing about this crisis...

Do you read news?

Have you read about the remdesivir protocol?

Do you think that this fact will be presented in American TV?

You make me laugh...

You despise people because they are so called " ignorant" or because they are so called  "failure" like Tesla....Look in a mirror....

Luc Montagnier is 89, and quite possibly no longer player with a full deck, and certainly is not applying good science.

@mahgister @yuviarora  he doesn't care about any of this. He's not inyerested in any new information, he will just ignore everything and jump to a different argument. 

well the variants are sure having their way with the anti vax herd immunity crowd…

dead is dead…lots of dead people….

I am not a robot but i still like Herman Cain, dead or alive