The Big Misconception About Electricity

It is like nothing changed .... since he wrote that in April 2020.

While better health is questionable in China, major comorbidities in the US w.r.t. Covid are significantly more severe, most of all way higher obesity. The expectation is the US would have higher death rates for all age groups with the exception of health care capacity, but that works in the US not most of the world.

His absolute position was based on very little information and even if we went that route, odds are it would have rapidly changed. The first wave was all old people. In subsequent waves, the hospitals filled with younger and younger people, in the US, the comorbidity of obesity a major issue. Then Delta of course happened and that changed the R0 value by a huge amount.

No doubt there were better ways to address the pandemic, but the good doctor wrote that based on exceptionally small amounts of information. Those that point to Sweden, not that their urbanization is way lower, their transit way less crowded, they have less ethnic large family groups in cities, etc. etc.

It would be nice if even one of you could use your own head and do a critical analysis before posting.

Yes Montagnier is senile and this Kulldorff never consult you... 😊

Do you think it is the only article he wrote?

Do you think you know more than him?

The reason i posted this article is to enlightened you about the total insanity of forced mandate massive vaccination...And the suppression of cheap treatment for those not a risk...do you know how and why remdesivir was used in all America for the ONLY treatment?

With your super analytical power of reading you certainly know...

For sure the things had changed , guess why?

Geert van den Bossche and all the doctors i posted about in the big list you reject by the back of the hand, picking 2 names and observing that they were not epidemiologist, for the sake of a petty argument ,all these doctors, read them like i did, after that you may go and insult me...(By the way there is many epidemiologists in the list)

By the way in a field out of your competence, or mine, you CANNOT do FIRST a CRITICAL ANALYSIS of an article or 2, you CORRELATE all the teachings of scientist with no conflict of interest WORLDWIDE...After that you may be able to read critically...

I begun this pandemy 2 years ago by studying one of the better virologist on earth Dr. Didier Raoult...And after that others...Doctors who treated patients , real doctors...

You know how are evaluated scientist OBJECTIVELY i presume? If you know ,this has nothing to do with your innate superpower of critical analysis... 

Because of the insane politization in the US and the corporate weights , we created a catastroph...

On Nov. 8, 2021, an abstract appeared in the Journal Circulation of the American Heart Association (AMA) showing that COVID vaccines “dramatically” increase heart inflammation in the people that were studies. Plus led to a substantial increase in the risk of heart complications, like myocarditis and heart attacks.

Twitter put a note on the post by the AMA, stating that it could be misleading and the study could have errors in it.

Cardiologist and NHS consultant Dr. Aseem Malhotra appeared on GBN explaining the findings, and while he was doing so he mentioned another study conducted by a well known cardiologist, who wished to remain anonymous, that found the same thing.

He stated the following,

“A few days ago after this was published (the abstract), somebody from a very prestigious British institution, cardiologist department, a researcher. A whistleblower if you’d like contacted me to say that the researchers in this department had found something similar within the coronary arteries linked to the vaccine, inflammation from imaging studies around the coronary arteries.

And they had a meeting, and these researchers at the moment have decided that they’re not going to publish their findings. Because they are concerned about losing research money from the drug industry.

Now this person was very upset about it, and um, I obviously wanted to share this on GB news today.”

Dr. Aseem Malhotra

What does this say about the current moment our world is living in? Important information is concealed due to the fact it may threaten one’s ability to work, leaving the public uninformed. Pharmaceutical companies not only threaten to stop ones funding if findings go against their business interests, but they also refuse acknowledge science that calls their products into question.

Many of these companies have long had a disregard for ethics and morals. They’ve even gone so far as to lie about the efficacy and the safety of their products. Robert G. Evans, PhD, Emeritus Professor, Vancouver School of Economics, UBC wrote a paper in 2010 titled “Tough on Crime? Pfizer and the CIHR,” it is accessible through the National Library of Medicine (PubMed). In it he outlines how Pfizer has been a “habitual offender,” constantly engaging in illegal and criminal activities. This particular paper points out that from 2002 to 2010, Pfizer has been “assessed $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards” and has set records for both criminal fines and total penalties. Keep in mind we are now in 2021 and these numbers have likely risen.

This is concerning, especially given the fact that these companies have big control over academic and medical institutions, as well as medical education.

“The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.”

Arnold Seymour Relman (1923-2014), Harvard Professor of Medicine and Former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal

I don't agree with the level of censorship that major platforms were engaging in and are engaging in.

However it is important to note that incidence of heart inflammation / myocarditis is many times higher in people who got covid and were not vaccinated. Given the odds of catching covid without controls, arguably though there are incidences of inflammation /myocarditis with vaccines, it would be much higher without them.

The importance of quality cables is in this sequence.  Speaker cables are THE most important and can make the biggest difference, followedby the interconnects, and in last place comes power cords.  This is true in my 55 years of listening experience.  My house gets clean power so the power conditioner made the least amount of noticable difference.