It depends. In general one larger sub will have more low-end extension than two smaller ones, but two smaller will be a bit faster than a single larger cone. 2 subs allow stereo separation above the point at which bass begins to become directional (about 60hz). Two subs also allow for a more even, across-the-room distribution of bass, but one can at least be tuned to the listening position very well. Your crossover point will determine a lot on the point about stereo separation - from the range of somewhere around 80 to 100hz and higher, you should maybe be thinking of 2 subs, anything below that and you can be thinking about one. Cheers!
Are two smaller subs better than one larger?
I have checked the threads, and many say that two subs are better than one. However, here is my question: are two smaller subs, say Martin Logan Depths, better than one larger sub, say Margin Logan Descent?
Thanks in advance, as usual,
Your brother in sonic bliss, or at least the continual search for it,
The rustler
Thanks in advance, as usual,
Your brother in sonic bliss, or at least the continual search for it,
The rustler
- ...
- 14 posts total
- 14 posts total