Hi, well,, I must say,,, actually I need a cold bucket dump,,haha. OK, got ya
WEll, in my limited audio world, thats bass in the Sophie Milman tracks.
Tell ya what, Stevie Wonder has a track on Inner Visions,, where the moog makes the woofers move 2-3 inches of solid slam sub- bass...maybe I will upload a quickie after this post,...I did upload a Elliott Carter score for FOUR!!! Timpini,, but this was with the Seas Thor demo.
Did not come off accurate,, the Sony cam had the timpini all distorted.
I’ll try again with the dual FR.
well, OK, so in my book, 40hz, is rock bottom. I am not least bit interested below 40hz.
So I give up the **real** bass(as you say..)) but I gain super midrange, why?
NO xovers,,WINNER
Higher sensitivity = Winner again
Double win.
PLUS its point source vs a tower like Sonus Faber, Dali, Rockport, Wilson, 3-6 drivers..
FR has decent bass/mids, nice highs all comming froma SINGLE driver.
Niceee sweetttt.
It beats me why FR has not been given their day in the sunshine.
I see Fr as the ultimate musical exp for light jazz, blues, classical.
The genres you mention, perhaps not such as 1st choice.
This is how I hear things.
Rolled off? In a 10x15 room, 60 SPL, near field, all sounds pretty good to my ears.
vs xover designs which I have issues with,, as you guys know. I am xover/low sens speakers most fierce critic
So i expect the same criticisms to come from yoyr camp against FR types.
I get that.
EDIT,,, was off to upload the intro to Stevie Wonders track off InnerVisions,, and realized that 1 UX250 tube went dark.
Trust me if a record has bass , these dual FR’s will deliver the goods.
8 + 6 inch cones, rockin N rollin with bass, as long as its in the actual record.
+ if I really want bass I’ll hook up the Defy with 12 Mundorf SESGO .47 caps, = will shred to confetti the wood cones in both FR speakers.
@ 12 oclock on the vol pot.
If we pushed the Defy hard, it would destroy Wilson’s biggest 8 speaker tower.
The towers would start to walk,, you
’d have to replace all woofers.