@tsushima1 I will take that as a compliment.
You are, you're.
Happy Christmas you cranky old sod. :)
Isoacoustics Orea vs Townshend Seismic Pod on Components
Post removed |
@tsushima1 I will take that as a compliment. You are, you're. Happy Christmas you cranky old sod. :) |
@astolfor @jerryg123 -- thanks for your feedback. I'm going to reduce the number of springs per footer and see if it makes a difference. @astolfor What do you mean by the least amount of springs? Does that mean I should start with a single spring? |
@arafiq I would start by using the least amount of springs possible to keep at least 2.5-3mm in each individual set. For example. lets say that you will end up using 4, and that your tube amp has 2 transformers on the back left and not much on the front. Then for your amp lets say you need 6 springs in the back-left to get the gap to 3mm, then your back-right might need 4 to keep the 3mm gap, then the front-right might need just 2 and the front-left 3 for example. If your amp is really heavy in the back, you might need lest say 4 sets. with, starting from the left-back all strings, then one less on the back-middle-left, 3 less for the back-middle right, and 4 less for the back right. In other words use the least amount of springs to keep the gap as consistent as you can. This should be your base line, and experiment from there either moving the sets around, changing the spring load or both. For my RELs I spent a lot of afternoons, trying different configurations, listening and measuring. REW is a great tool to visualize how your sound is changing and guide you in the right direction. By no means I am a sound engineer, sound expert or anything remotely similar. I used to do the tuning by ear but it would take me for ever, and not always end up with the sound I used to like, but the sound was not an accurate reproduction so it took me a while to get used and fully appreciate the changes. Give your ear time to adjust to the new sound, then move in the way you think is best. I have found that going back and forth without getting used to the new sound it led me many times in the wrong direction. For example one the records I was using that used to sound warm now started too too bright, but others records sounded much better, lots of definition and dimensionality. It turned up to be that the record was recorded too bright, and given the decay I had, before the changes, was very big so it kind of cancelled the brightness. Other records that felt had no bass, now they started to have very defined bass, I would assume that it could also be attributed to decay and distortion. I am an engineer so I make one change at the time, listen, make notes then measure and see how it correlates, and so on until I got now where I can be confident that I am listening to the records as recorded and not as an artifact of distortion, decay, timing etc. I would say that I am 75-80% where I would say that I am happy, I still have some excess energy around 28.5Hz and 321Hz that I need to fix but I have a very flat response. All this was achieved using Nobsound, Townshend pod and podiums, REW and moving things around in my room. The mechanical isolation was of huge help to position my speakers and subs. I am sorry if my English is not good that you can not understand. I just started to use English when referring to audio. |