Nietzsche and Runaway Audio Consumption


Came across this today. A lot of posts bring up the issue of "how much is enough?" or "when is audio consumption justified" etc.

Does this Nietzsche aphorism apply to audio buying? You be the judge! 

Friedrich Nietzsche“Danger in riches. — Only he who has spirit ought to have possessions: otherwise possessions are a public danger. For the possessor who does not know how to make use of the free time which his possessions could purchase him will always continue to strive after possessions: this striving will constitute his entertainment, his strategy in his war against boredom. 

Thus in the end the moderate possessions that would suffice the man of spirit are transformed into actual riches – riches which are in fact the glittering product of spiritual dependence and poverty. They only appear quite different from what their wretched origin would lead one to expect because they are able to mask themselves with art and culture: for they are, of course, able to purchase masks. By this means they arouse envy in the poorer and the uncultivated – who at bottom are envying culture and fail to recognize the masks as masks – and gradually prepare a social revolution: for gilded vulgarity and histrionic self-inflation in a supposed ‘enjoyment of culture’ instil into the latter the idea ‘it is only a matter of money’ – whereas, while it is to some extent a matter of money, it is much more a matter of spirit.” 

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1996. Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits. Cambridge University Press. (p. 283-4, an aphorism no. 310)

I'm pretty sure @mahgister will want to read this one! (Because they speak so artfully about avoiding the diversion that consumption poses to the quest for true aesthetic and acoustic excellence.)

128x128hilde45

By the way this is a little enigma for materialist: there exist people who live normal life, and even a case where it was a mathematician, with almost no brain at all , then if you think consciousness is produced ONLY by the brain think twice:

 

Can You Live Without a Brain? | Office for Science and Society - McGill University

I cannot wait to read materialist ideologue trying to debunk these two perfectly documented facts in history...

I suggest geometry, number theory and quantum mechanics...

And why not biographies of the greatest mystics in all religions?

 

 

Try to Debunk Emmanuel Swedenborg for example one of the greatest scientist and mystic of his time who was the first scientist of the Sweden kingdom all his life in ALL fields..Even the poor  Kant could not debunk him...He tried hard in a book....

You think that this mystic visionary who visit hell and paradise out of his body every day was a crook... Ok read that opinion about only ONE of his expertise field by a modern neurologist:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18641979/

ABSTRACT:

«I discuss three examples of neuroscientists whose ideas were ignored by their contemporaries but were accepted as major insights decades or even centuries later. The first is Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772) whose ideas on the functions of the cerebral cortex were amazingly prescient. The second is Claude Bernard (1813-1878) whose maxim that the constancy of the internal environment is the condition for the free life was not understood for about 50 years when it came to dominate the development of modern physiology. The third is Joseph Altman (1925-) who overturned the traditional dogma that no new neurons are made in the adult mammalian brain and was vindicated several decades later.»

 

 

 

 

Study and think BEFORE believing in the only EXISTENCE of "matter" or in the INEXISTENCE of ghosts or spirits....

Our own spirit we feel it and matter external to us it is ONLY a convenient HYPOTHESIS...Nothing more...

By the way my most important discovery this year was that we dont know YET what is sound...

Then think twice before reading audio magazine...

The only science is HISTORY of science...To quote Goethe in my own word....I add the word "ONLY " to be more clear using the Goethe sentence...

Idolization of science is SUPERSTITION like in transhumanist cult...

Human spirit progress by METAMORPHOSIS of himself in non linear time,not by a linear progress toward some transhumanist technological hubris "singularity" and HIVE mind...

 

Ok i apologize for my rant but i dont like when some people present their short uninformed opinions like EVIDENT uncontroversial PROVEN fact....

Reality exceed our little convenient opinions and toys....

And being a believer in God of which name you choose to name him or it, is no more stupid than being an activist atheist and materialist like Dawkins......in fact it is less stupid if we inform ourself...

I will myself adopt the less stupid and narrow stance... Guess which one and why ?

 

I forgot to correct my post: there is THREE parts in the Bruno Groning documentary: more than 4 hours...