Audiogon resolutions for 2022 - #1 less exaggeration when it comes to system changes

NO I'll do what I want. Toss me to the DOGS, I like them better anyways. I don't care who I offend. I don't try too often to offend people, but there comes a time. It's as simple as that.

If I voice an opinion and anyone, THAT'S YOU, who every you are, doesn't like, too bad.  Skip it, read over it, give it back to me, I DON'T really CARE.

The measure of me is ME and my maker, not my piers. I stand as ONE amongst many, I'm proud to say. I admire many, I follow NO ONE but "I AM"

Respect is a result of ones actions, it's not automatic. Caution on the other hand can be be misunderstood as RESPECT.. I wouldn't mix up the two..

Regards

@oldhvymec DO WHAT YOU WANT -- IN ALL CAPS! YOU DO YOU, MAN. happy new year, by the way.

@hilde45 - thanks. The point of my scale is to make it easy without arbitrary terminology. Its subjective as to how much (or not) better something sounds with some change to somebody’s system.

if they want to add comments or explanations to the rating, that’s fine, but at least we have a base rating/reaction.

@oldhvymec -you’re not typically prone to exaggeration, don’t sweat it.

+1 for point #2

@sokogear 

Good point. I'm not against learning *specialized* terminology, and indeed, that can often be very important. Commonsense terms often do not part easily — or stay parted — from their connotations.

I would not use the word "subjective" to describe problem of assessing the quality of sound in  someone else's system; the problem lies with any number of other variables which cannot be controlled for. It's merely an "objective" problem with multiple factors. And one of those factors can be another person's preference. But that's objective, too.