Nietzsche and Runaway Audio Consumption

I will add something to Feynman because focusing on a problem or on a question could be damaging by itself in some case..

Focusing and AT THE SAME TIME learning how to not focusing, but giving the problem to a part of our mind and going on on some other related or not related questions and field is very important in philosophy...Anyway philosophy is by definition multidisciplinary... Poetic and even astrology or mathematics can be philosophical tools and concern or any other fields ...

For sure if like Andrew Wyles you want to solve a mathematical problem, you must focus on it only non stop for 7 years to do so... Or if you must solve some a precise physic problem like Feyman related to an Apollo rocket mistake engineering piece, you must focus non stop for some days..

But philosophy is not mathematics nor engineering... Problems are not enigma to be solved but deep mysteries to be cautiously and indirectly approached with reverence and deep devotion... Problems here cannot be "solved" they can only be described in a new perspective for a new consciousness...

Goethe method in his natural science morphological observation deeply pointed to the fact that solutions and problems are interrelated perceived individual and at the same time universal "symbolic forms" like a particular undulated line drawn on a sheet of paper will be very differently perceived and described , by a monk, a painter, a shaman, a musician, a geometer, a mariner thinking about waves, or an alchemist, or by a physicist specialized in Fourier analysis, or by a meteorologist describing the sky....

There is no form without meaning and there is no meaning without form.... The formless is itself a "form"....And any form speak from the formless...

Then going back to your observation : most people are unable to focus consciously, and much more unable to learn how to not focus consciously and mastering the art of attention...

Attention imply 2 levels polarity : the foci, and the periphereal....

If you can accept the Feynman theory of learning ie focus, understanding, being able to recall and then to explain to others, then you can see where the problem might lie....

The human mind is a great thing, no doubt. Unfortunately it doesn’t come with any kind of user manual.

History never repeat itself like in a circle, but repeat itself like on an helicoidal cycle.. The same and not the same ....

The "Great Year cycle" in traditional astronomy, is a perfect illustration of that...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Year

Thinking that events in the universe and on Earth were completely unrelated and did never affect one another is now scientifically ridiculous...

Guess what happened when mankind detonated thermonuclear weapon in the sky ?

Guess what happen to our sun crossing different parts of the galaxy and "coughing" toward Earth ?

There exist proven scientific facts, but also science give us way more than numerous small proven facts, science give to each ERA his own abilty to imagine new rational and possible perspectives even if these perspective cannot be strictly proven to exist... Darwin never strictly  proved that man descend from the ape, he gives us a rational relation and new perspective by pointing to ape and man in an  environmental context.......

Basic human needs dont change but they express themselves in new ways through all evolution and through all history....These transformation of their expression is history...

When Cesar decided coming back from his  Gallic wars  to cross the Rubicon river WITH HIS ARMY  it was a SYMBOLIC gesture of rebellion against the Rome republic, which expressed a basic need for total freedom but in a new context...

Semiotic teach us that symbols are real like a tree is real for consciousness...Rubicon is not just a mass of flowing water....

Well, some people do say that history has a way of repeating itself. Perhaps not surprising given that human needs and desires remain the same as they always did.

Pfizer for example  is one of the worst proven criminal  enterprise which had payed many billions of dollars in criminal fines in the past decades....

I dont need to add anything to this fact....

We can trust big pharma.

Like i already said, Bernard Mandeville the master mind behind liberal capitalism, not Adam Smith who plagiarize it, is the redactor of the manual of mass control, which would make Machiavel a children... I read Machiavel also by the way... It is a children compared to Mandeville...

Now the bankers behind capital controls always DECIDED which will receive capitals and for what....It is not complotism doctrine but only a human fact about greed...

Is it not simple?

By the way Dr. Mabuse film precisely described the manipulation behind financial speculation and wars in the first thirty minutes...No Hollywood movie describe it better than he already did one century after it....

Basically most of the major wars since 1815 have been bankers wars, and yet...

Not a single movie has dared to depict them as such.

A war unplanned with no money never existed save in victimized country or people...

By the way between conditioned sleepwalking mass and their masters, there is no "controls" there is not much a "plot" but a SIMILAR make up of the mind by the endoctrinated mass and those who endoctrinated them..

The difference between Hitler, Stalin, Rockfeller, Pierpont-Morgan etc and any power man and the ordinary people, is that the Hitler, Stalin, Rockfeller, Pierpont-Morgan BELIEVE more in their ideology that even the people who are conditioned by them... The mindframe of Stalin is even Narrower that any communist leader under him and narrower than any russians, WHY ?

Because their narrow mind reflect their total focus on only ONE target : control...They concentrated focus of attention is the only reason of their power...

Then Stalin , Hitler or any powerful man are the FIRST VICTIM of  their ideology...

There is much less of a complotism here in history  than a complete closure of the mind and a narrowing of the attention...

Are Hitler, Stalin, Rockfeller, Pierpont-Morgan, or any other man of power reflect that  they are only  EVIL and mostly  evil ?

Not at all, in many cases , they are sleepwalking more deeply in their sleep than even the mass of the people they indoctrinated in their beliefs about states, capitalism or any other ideology....

Murderers are evil for sure but i spoke here about  the power perspective...

I hear things are much better in La La land.

Fussing about capitalism on a high end luxury web site is an interesting scenario.