Replicant 100 stylus

As I explained in my introduction 3 persons looking true microscope

were not able to see any difference between Paratrace, Replicant

and stylus in London Decca. This imply that ''someone'' must produced

this stylus. ''Someone'' is existential quantifier because ''lt'' assume

existence of some object or entity. There this name Pegasus which

assumes existence of an flying  horse. We somehow know that this

animal does not exists. Logical  reading of this quantifier is that the

statement which entail this expression is true if at least  one object

satisfy condition ''some''. More than one is also welcome.

You stated : ''I am open to be corrected''. 

Really? 

Well which question are you trying to answer? 

''We'' also have similar problem with dover. He is not only ''high level

humorist '' but also enjoy teasing his co-member nandric. .To my

self invitation to N.Zealand he offered to me one half glass of wine.

And to my opinion about ''retips'' I got his advice to ask my

retiper to turn the same stylus ''left for right'' because only right

side is worn out because I don't use anti-skate. 

So it may be possible that his place were Replicant are produced is

not really Ireland? 

pimda, sorry my humour must be  '' low level'' kind.

Yes, Astatic builded its own cartridges under the Mitachi design. Same as Glanz.

Btw, in all internet audio forum exist some persons that are " dedicated " to often posts very low knowledge issue/audio levels boarding in the stupidity.

Agos is no exception and in this forum and for years there were two of that kind of persons fortunatelly looks like one of them just gone because does not post any more but unfortunatelly other person already took his place.

Is really stupid to have a " decent " audio dialogue with any of these persons.

R.