Aqua 'La Diva' ($9k) or Gryphon 'Ethos' ($39k) versus. Pro-Ject CD Box RS2 T ($3k)?


What sensible rationale is there for buying either of the two above-mentioned VERY COSTLY CD spinners (Aqua ’La Diva,’ a CD-only transport, and the Gryphon ’Ethos,’ a CD player with built-in DAC) when we can get the same pure Red-Book CD digital output from the Pro-Ject CD Box RS2 T for FAR less money?

What is a potential buyer getting for their significantly increased expenditure other than fancy packaging and possibly a boost to their egos from ownership of a prestige brand-name item? The one component (and a crucially-significant one at that) which all three of these products have in common is the new Philips-based Stream Unlimited CD Pro 8 CD player mechanism. Aside than that, what one appears to get with the two far-higher-priced components is little more than pure window-dressing, not substantive gains in performance over the CD Box RS2 T.

It is little wonder that one reviewer of the RS2 T thinks of it as nothing less than a "giant killer," in that it makes it nearly impossible for any level-headed purchaser, even one with the means to spend lavishly, to rationalize spending thousands of dollars more on these two competing products (or on others like them) when one can get the same sonic results (which from most reports are splendid) from the humble little CD Box.

Any thoughts? Do we audiophiles finally have good reason to come to our buying senses? To me, Pro-Ject Audio Systems may have struck a true winning vein with their CD Box when prospecting for gold.

128x128erictal4075

This is quite a looker. Love that the inside is painted with Nextel to absorb any and all stray light. I wonder what it will go for?

All the best,
Nonoise

I agree that the Pro-ject RS2T is a fantastic transport. Just received mine a couple of weeks ago along with the Pro-Ject Linear Power Supply.

I owned the Aurender ACS100 and compared the rips from it to my iMac using DBpoweramp. Zero difference in sound quality. The ACS100 has a cheap TEAC CD drive and and a HDD. There is nothing special about the ripping architecture in the Aurender, and Aurender doesn’t make any claims about the ripping quality of the ACS100 compared to other methods.

By the way in my system and in my opinion the ACS100, which I purchased new didn’t sound good to me as compared to my PS Audio Directstream DAC w/bridge II. I sold it at a loss.