Tidal vs Qubuz - Steely Dan "Jack of Speed"


So I should have posted this a year ago, but never got around to it. I had a subscription to both providers about a year ago and was comparing audio quality between them. I queued up "Jack of Speed" on both and noticed a dramatic difference in the mix between them. The reoccurring trombone hook was burried in the Qobuz version to distraction, while the Tidal version sounded as I’ve always heard it. I then put on the original CD release & compared it to Qobuz. Totally different! I let the Qobuz free trial lapse & continued on with Tidal because of this. So, all of you Dan fans with subscriptions to both... Compare these tracks and let me know if you hear the differences. Would love to know your opinions.

stevehardy1

Find your favorite streaming source and live happily. It's great, too, that the streaming sources each have their own personalities. Not to mention separate sets of ears.

I have had Tidal for a couple of years and Qobuz for the past month.  I signed up for a year of Qobuz after the free trial.  I agree with @jjss49 who said:

i think both services sound very good, though subtly different

However, I would not ascribe a consistent sound to the difference in that I couldn't say Qobuz sounds like this and Tidal sounds like that - just a little different, maybe.  At at this time, after only a month with Qobuz, I would not definitively rank one above the other based on SQ, although I am enjoying having more content to choose from.  I will likely keep both but wanted to give myself the year to decide.

One track does not an informed decision make.

Good enough for some to opine about.

I have both Tidal and Qobuz subscriptions that I run through Roon software using a Roon Nucleus as my music streamer. I always choose the recording with the highest bitrate available from either service. Most often my preference is to listen to the Qobuz provided recording because in my system I feel that Qobuz sounds better to my ears. I’m very familiar with the song Jack of Speed from the Steely Dan album Two Against Nature, and I like it very much. On Qobuz it is offered in a 96kHz/24bit format. Whereas on Tidal it is a FLAC 48kHz/24bit format or an MQA 96kKz recording. I prefer how Qobuz sounds over Tidal on this particular album. I am not a fan of MQA. 

You didnot mention if you had to have MQA engaged , many dac makers will not pay for what is a enhanced but still compressed Version with  MQA 

I never had tried Tidal. Because Briscati, or Denafrips and many others will  not pay   MQA  and their fee . Please explain what version of Tidal and monthly charge is needed ?