About users with hidden agendas

Are you really this dim … There is no “actionable innuendo” , there is a simple factual link to a statement made by another party who makes reference to you!

Why have you not taken action against that publication if as you claim it is entirely false ?

In fact you have accused me of acting in a defamatory manner thereby attempting to lower my esteem in the eyes of other members here … Ergo You have defamed my character  on this forum !!!

Do any of you find it ironic that in a thread devoted to MC-where some are relieved that he is gone because he stirs the pot and others lament his absence, this has turned into a cluster**** without said MC participating? Maybe we all need to look at ourselves, what we want from this site and other participants and consider the kinds of rules of behavior that are acceptable. 

I've been on many an Internet site in the day and dealt with lots of Internet litigation over the basic rules of conduct  in the U.S. and abroad. This thread is an embarrassing reflection of "us". I'm not pointing fingers because I really have no idea who started what but I suspect that even those who like MC would find this distracting and beside the point for an audio forum. 

The Gon administration should also take the time to compose some reasonable terms of use. When I last looked, a while ago, the TOU did not prohibit a lot of conduct that is irrelevant, including the discussion of politics. 

I'm not reporting anybody. I'm not a narc. But, I've been here a while and like to contribute and learn. This is so far removed from the purpose of the forum I have to ask-- do you find this acceptable? (that's a rhetorical question that does not require an answer). 

I wish everyone the best.

Bill Hart

Several people need to walk away from all of this madness. I cannot stand it here. Tom

Music is art. Art is subjective. Thus music is subjective. I might be a noob when it comes to systems, but I am right about that. 

I own Synergistic Research Foundation cables. I was a doubter in the impacts cables could have until I upgraded what I owned to those Foundation cables. I consider them as important to my system as my McIntosh gear.  

@ted_denney Keep making those fantastic cables. I know when my wife actually comments that the music sounds bigger with "those new cables" you are onto something. Thanks!

It wasn't that long ago that there was this big brouhaha over cables, subjective vs objective approaches and the like and Audioholics was taken to task by the members here at A'gon.

Did the other shoe drop? I recall that most here called out Gene from Audioholics and his merry band of objectivists who tried to run roughshod over A'gon, trying to take it over with their arguments and ended up losing.

Did some reinvent themselves to have a go at Ted? When Ted started his threads, he was taken to task over them and I pointed out (quite a while ago) that all he was doing was what everyone else does and why all the acrimony. 

Something fishy is afoot.

All the best,
Nonoise