@mulveling Thing is nobody pays MSRP. More like 80% MSRP is common. So your used cartridge with rebuild that came out to 80% of MSRP is the same as just buying new but without any warranty and a lot of risk and hassle.
Would you pay more than 25% of MSRP for a used cartridge?
Seems most seller want to price their "low-hour" used cartridges at 50-80% of MSRP. This seems ridiculous to me because there is no sure way to verify these "low-hour" claims. You need to have specialized microscopes and even then it's a just a guestimate if worn or not.
Another point is even a cartridge with 1000+ hours can still sound very good. A worn stylus will mistrack only on certain passages of certain demanding records. So it is nothing obvious.
So why do all these folks price their used cartridges so high? Are folks actually paying these prices?
My max. would be 25% of MSRP for any "low-hour" claim.
- ...
- 32 posts total
My point was having the rebuild option as a fallback helps mitigate the risk, IF everything else goes to crap, which it usually doesn’t. And how often is warranty meaningful with cartridges? Most deaths are caused by user error or eventual wear. I suppose you guys have never gambled or bought a lotto ticket either lol. I bought a Koetsu Onyx ~350 hours for $3k when MSRP was 9 or 10, it sounded amazing, got years of use, then I had it rebuilt by Koetsu Japan like new and the total outlay was still less than a discounted new one. It was a GREAT deal. |
ebm:"Would never get a used cartridge as the 100 hours routine is getting very old" I use a clicker to count sides. Obviously not 100% accurate for actual hours played but it will give me a pretty good idea +- later on |
One method to avoid upset is to arrange an agreement between Vendor, Buyer and a Third Party, who is to receive the Cartridge, the Third Party will need to be recognised for being able to assess the condition of the Cartridge and the assessment will be the agreed guidance for the establishing the condition. If all appears to be as described in the Ad, then the Cart' can be paid for as agreed. If the Cart' does not meet the adverts description on condition, the Cart' can be returned to the Vendor, or an alternative arrangement might be agreed on the outcome of the assessment. This obviously incurs an extra cost, for the assessment and the extra shipping. If I were to be keeping the Cart' as a result of the inspection/assessment, I would request a through cleaning of the assembly, and this will usually be a charge that has the inspection offset against the overall cost. I have done this in the past with a Cart' and the outcome was fine, this Cart' eventually become a donor for a rebuild as the Cart' was without any concerning issues when re-inspected. On another occasion I sent many of the supplied images of the Cart' to a respected Third Party Service and was given a reassurance that their was nothing noticeably concerning from the photo evidence. I accepted the evaluation and own this Cartridge as a result. I always do this arrangement when buying vintage valves, the Vendor agrees to my having the Valves re-tested. This has proved to be very prudent, as a few low measurements have been discovered by the Third Party Service that I use. In this case the service is only a short drive away from my home, and is a fellow HiFi enthusiast.
|
- 32 posts total