2. best-of
  3. 175314-156

Moderation/Censorship Poll and surely more...

Hi. 

I'm here over 8 years and back then, I think the moderation guidelines were much lighter than today.  I think it's okay to have all foolish posts of ebm instead of removing part of them IMHO. 

Having that as a fact would you like to

A) Leave it same way?

B) Bring more rules?

C) Decrease rules?

 

 

czarivey
larsman's avatar
larsman
1,982 posts
 

"Free speech" does not imply that anybody is obligated to publish or post it. 

rocray's avatar
rocray
1,448 posts
 

As much as I disagree with many lines of thinking,or behavior, censorship is almost always bad.  It promotes the agenda of those censoring.  If you don’t get an opinion,I’m right. Period. Does that sound fair? 

jerryg123's avatar
jerryg123
3,429 posts
 

Or the Squad @thyname …..hunter.

roxy54's avatar
roxy54
8,011 posts
 

Matt,

You've been here long enough to know that this is a privately owned site, and therefore unimpeded "free speech" doesn't apply. What were you thinking?

jtcf's avatar
jtcf
1,620 posts
 

roxy54 is correct. The site can have whatever rules that they want and insist they be followed. The couple of mods here are volunteers and sometimes they delete large groups of posts and accidentally delete a few that are perfectly fine when they get in a hurry. They don't have time to babysit and remind people to act like adults. They also take care of issues with the sales too.What a fun job🙄

More to discover