I have never owned the Superfly, so I can't comment on them. I do own the Omen Defs and recently upgraded to the new Nano drivers. I had the HO drivers from the Superfly previously, and the sensitivity is the same as the new Nanotech drivers. I run the Omen Defs with a nice sub and they are fantastic. Running the Omen Defs with a pair of subs sounds like a great option to me. If you want to get the ultimate sound, I would recommend upgrading the xover on the tweeters to what the Superfly has (Mundorf Silver in Oil caps). That makes them equivalent to the Def IIIs (minus the built in sub and cabinet bracing). It improved clarity and air, and removed a slight harshness I could hear when the speakers were driven hard.
Zu Superfly Mk1-B vs Zu Omen Def Mk1-B?
Hi
Anyone have thoughts on superfly Mk 1-B vs Omen Def Mk 1-B?
With new driver, they say Omen Def 1-B now has sensitivity of 100 db/W -- which is close to superfly Mk 1-B (101).
In past, I would get superfly as sensitivity is very important, but now with this new Omen Def I am no longer sure what the difference is. Also, if new driver is so much more sensitive, why is superfly sensitivity unchanged?
I have well loaded dual subs, so I could run 2 Omen Def + 2 Sub and get close to def performance?
Anyone have thoughts on superfly Mk 1-B vs Omen Def Mk 1-B?
With new driver, they say Omen Def 1-B now has sensitivity of 100 db/W -- which is close to superfly Mk 1-B (101).
In past, I would get superfly as sensitivity is very important, but now with this new Omen Def I am no longer sure what the difference is. Also, if new driver is so much more sensitive, why is superfly sensitivity unchanged?
I have well loaded dual subs, so I could run 2 Omen Def + 2 Sub and get close to def performance?
- ...
- 2 posts total
- 2 posts total