@mahgister - I am aware of Helmholtz resonators, I have read of their effectiveness but to be honest, I’d have a very steep learning curve on those. They certainly seem to be a lot more work than what I’ve done so far. Congratulations on your patience, because learning how to do it, before even implementation - wow.
Anyone in here thinking I am overstating, just look at the math:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/helmholtz-resonator
or, since p˜m=p˜b1−Q˜Za,rad,
where p˜b1 is the complex amplitude of the blocked pressure, Zint is the acoustic impedance of the resonator presented at the mouth, which comprises the sum of the impedances of the air in the neck and in the cavity, and Za,rad is the acoustic radiation impedance of the mouth. For a circular mouth of radius a it is given to a close approximation by the radiation impedance of a rigid circular piston with ka ≪ 1.
which shows that the reactive (nearfield) component dominates where ka ≪ 1.
The mean sound power absorbed by the resonator is given by
This attains a maximum value at the resonance frequency when |Zint + Za,rad| = |Rint + Ra,rad|. This maximum may be maximized by equalizing the internal resistance and radiation resistance of the resonator, to give