Nano sound: 1G vs 2G


I've long enjoyed my first generation black nano and just purchased a second generation black nano for the increased space, increased battery life and even smaller size.

After trying it out for an hour or so, I can't help but feel that the sound quality is worse than the first generation - contrary to some of the reviews. It does seem to offer more high end sparkle, for sure, but there seems to be a substanial mid-range suckout. There are specific pieces of music that I listen to on the cardio machine very often, and I can tell that certain instruments are MIA or substantially de-emphasized.

Worse, the the overall sound seems shrill compared to the original.

Have any of you had a chance to compare 1G vs 2G nano sound?

Thanks,
Art

ps: When I migrated from the old hard drive based "mini" to the 1G nano, I felt the nano sound was far more grain-free and overall a substantial improvement. My apriori expectation was a further improvement in 2G nano.

pps: I don't use the ear buds that come with the unit. I use a sports headset from Sony for exercise and Shure 3c for quality.
artmaltman
I posted this inquiry to the Apple bulletin board and also ilounge. I've gotten a handful of responses like this one:

"Well I have a new nano, and I also had an old nano. I miss my old nano, because it's true that the midrange on the new ones absolutely suck imo."

That is precisely my experience. I did some more testing last night at the Apple store.

Some GOOD News: the 30 gig and 80 gig have very full, robust midrange and extraordinary bass as well. Very nice sound quality, perhaps a bit thick in the lower mids, but at least they are not MIA! In favor of the new 2nd gen nano is a clean, clear sound on top that I've not heard before from ipods, but the missing midrange just kills it for me.
Yes. EQ does not quite fix it, but also, EQ is notorious on ipods for adding a bit of distortion and reducing battery life (not sure why the latter would be the case).
Art