Thanks for replies guys and sorry for the typos. (A too long post written too
late in the night. Also, English is not my first language.)
Noelpastor, your suggestion is certainly valid, however, I am not really
interested in buying the Diablos. I have heard the Diablos quite a few times
and I have liked them (but never enough to justify the huge price difference
between them and the MicroBes). The Diablos and the MicroBes share the
same Focal-school sound, i.e. fast and transparent, with the Diablos being
faster and more transparent than the MicroBes. I also do not like the
smiley/emoticon look of the Diablos (though this is less important).
Finally, I should say that Diablos are not the only transparent and fast
speakers that did not impressed me, Tidal and Magico did the same every
time I have heard them :). On the other hand, last year I had the Dynaudio
Confidence C1 mk1 speaker in my system for a week and I was extremely
impress with their performance - that full and coherent midrange blow me
away. If, in the end, I will go the Accuphase route, than most likely, at some
point, I will buy also a pair of Dyns (C1 or C2).
Linkster, would you care to elaborate why you think my room will be too small
for the TADs? This is indeed one of my concerns. In Munich the TAD Evolution
One speakers had absolutely no problem to fill a huge room (probably
more than 100 square meter) with marvelous sound. Are TAD speakers design
for large rooms? On the other hand, in the manual of Avantgarde UNOs it is
recommended to use the UNOs in rooms of at least 16 square meters. Since
my room is a bit larger than that, and since the TAD CR-1 speakers do not
have four ten inch woofers I was hopping I could use them in my room.
Paul
late in the night. Also, English is not my first language.)
Noelpastor, your suggestion is certainly valid, however, I am not really
interested in buying the Diablos. I have heard the Diablos quite a few times
and I have liked them (but never enough to justify the huge price difference
between them and the MicroBes). The Diablos and the MicroBes share the
same Focal-school sound, i.e. fast and transparent, with the Diablos being
faster and more transparent than the MicroBes. I also do not like the
smiley/emoticon look of the Diablos (though this is less important).
Finally, I should say that Diablos are not the only transparent and fast
speakers that did not impressed me, Tidal and Magico did the same every
time I have heard them :). On the other hand, last year I had the Dynaudio
Confidence C1 mk1 speaker in my system for a week and I was extremely
impress with their performance - that full and coherent midrange blow me
away. If, in the end, I will go the Accuphase route, than most likely, at some
point, I will buy also a pair of Dyns (C1 or C2).
Linkster, would you care to elaborate why you think my room will be too small
for the TADs? This is indeed one of my concerns. In Munich the TAD Evolution
One speakers had absolutely no problem to fill a huge room (probably
more than 100 square meter) with marvelous sound. Are TAD speakers design
for large rooms? On the other hand, in the manual of Avantgarde UNOs it is
recommended to use the UNOs in rooms of at least 16 square meters. Since
my room is a bit larger than that, and since the TAD CR-1 speakers do not
have four ten inch woofers I was hopping I could use them in my room.
Paul