Acoustic did not is reducible to psycho-acoustic science...
Psycho-acoustic science dit not reduce itself to acoustic...
Great posts thanks.... Gear fetichist tasting group and measuring tool fetichists perhaps will understand something....
We cannot measure the difference between a middle C, played on a properly tuned clarinet vs. a synthesizer, vs. a trumpet. Your brain knows which is which immediately. Just like humming the note and singing out, wide-mouthed would measure identical, but you know they sound very different.
Nor can we measure the vibrations our body picks up from places other than our tympanic membrane. (bones, hairs, nerves) Spatial awareness in ingrained in us through evolution. A noise, rustling in the grass on the savannah is a matter of life and death. Our ears are only a piece of the "listening" equation.
I’ve played with EQ and a spectrum analyzer to make the response curves of Magnepans and Klipsch horn-loaded box speakers measure the same in my seat ...and they sure don’t sound identical, though no frequencies are missing.
No measurer can ever tell you which one, out of 2 pieces of gear sounds better. (however you define it.
A timbre is not a tone...A playing tone is made of two phenomenon then...
It’s trivially simple to measure the difference between a clarinet and a trumpet.