Do you spend more time analyzing the sound of your system, worrying it could be better?

Do you spend more time analyzing the sound of your system, worrying it could be better?

no

No, it could ALWAYS be better sound than mine for sure...

But all is a question about S.Q. /price ratio...Mine is over the roof at this price scale ...

Diminishing returns law play some part if we think about upgrade at some levels scale near one another and not too far away of one anther for sure...

And more importantly i am lucky enough to have acoustic control over the room in my case...

i dont bother about upgrade and i dont bother about my sound quality at all...no more frustrations...

I listen music.... 😁😊

Acoustic method surpass most upgrading of a piece of gear ...No reviewer claim that, i claim it...They sell product, i motivate people to learn about acoustic at low cost...

And it is better to understand why a system/ room may sound so good instead of just plugging a piece of gear in the wall and claiming that it sound good whitout ever knowing why....

I know exactly why and HOW my system/room sound good, i dont only claim it... How and why did i know it ?

Because i can modify all aspect of acoustic cues at will: timbre, dynamic, soundstage, Lev/asw ratio, bass impact and clarity... Thanks to Helmholtz...

@mahgister as do I.

Love the one your with.

The only things I ever obsess over are spitty sibilants and screechy violins. And oh yeah, boomy bass. I enjoy the heck out of imaging and soundstaging, but if it ain't in the recording I ain't gonna go crazy.

Here's another way of framing the question:

"Do you ENJOY spending time enjoying improving -- or just tinkering with -- your system?"

If the answer to that is "yes" then there is no problem that Dan Wright needs to solve.

Honestly, for a forum focused on hobbyists, there's a lot of hand-wringing about being, well, a hobbyist.