Turntable upgrade recommendations: SME vs AMG vs Technics vs other
I've recently upgraded most of my system, but I still have a Rega P8, with Linn Krystal cartridge, which I like, but I've heard that there may be better options.
I have Sound Lab electrostatic speakers, Ypsilon Hyperior amplifiers, an Ypsilon PST-100 Mk2 pre-amplifier, and am thinking about an Ypsilon phono stage to match with my system, and a turntable/cartridge. I listen to almost entirely classical, acoustic music.
Based on my very limited knowledge, and simple research, I've been looking at three brands, each of which is a different type of turntable: SME (suspension), AMG (mass), and Technics (direct drive).
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different types of turntables, and of those in particular?
Thanks.
Without direct, personal experience, I am super impressed with the Kronos TT. The counterrotating “platter” under has been said to be the only true innovation in T T design in many years. Seems logical that the precision and stability of rotation is key to the function. The show rooms which use the Kronos all speak superlatively. I would love to hear one. |
Don't recall if this topic has come up, but have you considered ultra-sonic record cleaning? Big benefits right away - quieter, more revealing - and big benefits delayed - low stylus wear. My own stylus costs a lot to replace, so the US cleaning system is paying for itself twice over. In any case, well done by you! |
Funny that you should bring that up! One of my audiophile friends insists that I buy a Degritter for U/S record cleaning. I bought a VEVOR U/S record cleaner instead a few months ago, which I can tell really makes a big improvement. I (obviously) don't mind spending the money necessary for a significantly improved result, but I don't know if the Degritter is worth the $3000 price, when the VEVOR is available for $225. Ideally, I would compare the two devices side by side, to see if there's an audible improvement after the Degritter vs VEVOR, but I haven't done that yet. . . maybe that's a project for next month. . . |
I use a lab grade US tank, made by Elmasonic. Runs at 80KHz or 37KHz - I use 80, and a rotating spindle to run one revolution per 9 minutes. Usually once through is enough, but some garage sale specimens have required 3. Two threads might interest you: one here on Audiogon by antinn, a high class expert in cleaning technology. The other is a long thread on DIYaudio. Turns out that 80KHz is a really good frequency for records. The reasons you might want a lab machine are: 80 KHz, internal heater, enough consistent power, and generally meets spec. As you know, lab equipment has to meet spec or there is Hell to pay. Consumer audio, not so much. Bit of a DIY approach, but that's my style ... |
Plenty to learn from in the link about Methods to clean Vinyl LP's I am using the Manual Method and on a Batch of Six Plus LP's can clean in approx' 10 Minutes per LP. I did intend on using the owned US Tank for the final rinse cycle, but the impressions made has created the condition of a LP where it is felt and additional steps are not needed. The Manual Method is not as convenient, but is very affordable and the 'Job Well Done' aspect is quite satisfying.
Precision Aqueous Cleaning of Vinyl Records - The Vinyl Press |
