2. digital
  3. 1177301443

comfused about ripping?

To all my fellow Audiogoners. I am reading and trying my best to absorb all the infomation on ripping cds to a pc with great interest. I am still greatly comfused with this new technology so please have patients. I would like to know what sites will help me with the right infomation with building a system,what type of software that is needed , hard drive and also hardware such as needing a pc tower for storage and so on. I will be ever so greatful and would also like to know if you all are giving up on your cd players and would you consider the sound a leap compared to standard audiophile cd players on the market? Thank you all.
schipo
schipo OP
1,268 posts
 
Again I thank you for this info. I would most likely go hard wired and 2 channel.
gmood1
1,251 posts
 
OK if your PC will be in the same room. I would go PC> USB DAC > Home stereo . It is the simplest of the group. No special PC modding needed. It is plug and play.. one usb cable and a USB Dac.. You'll have to configure your preferred player. This is explained in the links above to some degree.
schipo OP
1,268 posts
 
Thank you very much and have a great day.
kublakhan
718 posts
 
If you have $50/hr to spend i have a guy who will talk you though every
aspect of the setup. He's really great. I found him when searching for info on
setting up EAC (exact audio copy) because the setting are very confusing. He
has a free site online with instructions but i choose to just pay him for total
phone support. Very professional and patient.

he takes paypal!

let me know via email and i'll dig up his address for you.

(btw, i would recommend ripping to Apple Lossless since Flac can't be played
on an iPod if you ever decide to use one. I would also recommend not getting
a tower but something quiet like a Mac mini or a fanless PC or a macbook -
although some of the lower priced macbooks i think may be noisy.)
chazzbo
1,007 posts
 
As I p[ut ion above DAC I became interested in it myself only or using digital to sore CD;'s because I know that CD-R's/DVD-R's have shelf life and for archving using my computer opnly made sense if sound didn't suck (like MD).Apple Lossless is prety close to ddientical to CD sound and price of harddrives is getting so low (you can get a half a Terrabyter or 500 gig for $150) that instead of jus making a copy of a CD ontopa CD-R which can develoipe dropouts in 4-7 years on average backiong musioc on HD's is one more line of defense.Copy and LP onto two CD-R's is my practice now and soon I will include a hard drive back up since I won't have to copmpress the hell out of it and make crummy recording.Now I know you can have dropouts on a HD or whole sector failures or maybe the bearing can go and HD will crash.I just hope that having three masters will allow me in 10+ years to assemble one intact recording from all three.As I read in an article a german chemist repotered that magnetuc tape is still best way to store music for 25+ years.But sine analogue Reel to Reel and DAT seem to be studio only formats (expense and uge reels with former and high deck maitenance with latter) the recording that will last hasn't been important to anybody making consumer gear which is too bad.Think it backs up what Fremmer said recently in Stereophile that he is martal enemy or many newspaper columnists who get audio beat but are computer people and know dick about good sound.Know this is on fringes of original post but is part of story
Chazzbo
More to discover