Amir and Blind Testing


Let me start by saying I like watching Amir from ASR, so please let’s not get harsh or the thread will be deleted. Many times, Amir has noted that when we’re inserting a new component in our system, our brains go into (to paraphrase) “analytical mode” and we start hearing imaginary improvements. He has reiterated this many times, saying that when he switched to an expensive cable he heard improvements, but when he switched back to the cheap one, he also heard improvements because the brain switches from “music enjoyment mode” to “analytical mode.” Following this logic, which I agree with, wouldn’t blind testing, or any A/B testing be compromised because our brains are always in analytical mode and therefore feeding us inaccurate data? Seems to me you need to relax for a few hours at least and listen to a variety of music before your brain can accurately assess whether something is an actual improvement.  Perhaps A/B testing is a strawman argument, because the human brain is not a spectrum analyzer.  We are too affected by our biases to come up with any valid data.  Maybe. 

chayro

My quote did not remove any relevant context.

 

I lived though the same ordeal rankaudio... 😁😊

They are many pompuous very clever but closed minds ignoring anything resembling a listening experiments but Amir was polite...There are good people also there listen me right but they are dominated by a minority of bullys protecting the master...They are easy to recognized, some come here ridiculizing anyone who listen with his ears... Their common point is a total ignborance of acoustic condition because they need electrical tools they dont need to tune a room... All rooms are equal for their activities....

I am a naive person generally and i trust people to a point...

I quited this reunion of disciples also...After they laugh a lot about my "quartz/shungite experiments... 😁😊

Sheeps crowd are not for me...

Here sheeps exist too but most people LISTEN...With ears...

Do you learned how to read? i think so if i read your posts...

Perhaps my english is not exemplary i dont doubt that...But your interpretation is not my words...

it is evident here that i spoke about SOME people on ASR not about ALL people there..

i even precisely mention a "few bullys"...

I must conclude after your insult that you have a grudge about me here because you seem too much intelligent to be unable to read the context..Who are you then? you are new here, and i welcome you, and you picked one of my post, misread it in an evident way and you go on after me... Comical...

 

For example in my post  , "their common point"; "their" refer to whom here?

it refer to the "few bullys"...not to the ASR site in his totality...

Anybody read that clearly in my post and not your distorted interpretation...

I know you are clever, then what i must conclude?

I even said many times here and in this post that Amirm was polite and honest then what?

There is only 2 possibilities you have a grudge against me but i dont know you then i must conclude to your bad faith...

Sorry but i refuse to think that you cannot know how to read a text like an idiot..You are not an idiot, you are evidently very intelligent... Then you quoted me in bad faith...For whatever reason i dont know...

Are you one of the few bullys on ASR?

your choice of name for your avatar goes in this interpretative direction...

It is the first time someone insult me here AFTER i welcome him on another thread where he was attacked...Comical...

 

 

😁😊

 

«

They are many pompuous very clever but closed minds ignoring anything resembling a listening experiments but Amir was polite...There are good people also there listen me right but they are dominated by a minority of bullys protecting the master...They are easy to recognized, some come here ridiculizing anyone who listen with his ears... Their common point is a total ignborance of acoustic condition because they need electrical tools they dont need to tune a room... All rooms are equal for their activities...»

This is your first post criticizing me with a TRUNCATED sentence from my original post :

With this truncated extract everyone can think rightfully so that i speak badly about ALL PEOPLE participating in ASR forum...

 

@mahgister

 

I understood quite clearly what you posted. You without any lack of clarity accused the users of the Audio Science site of ignorance wrt the need for room acoustic treatment. I will post it again.

Their common point is a total ignborance of acoustic condition because they need electrical tools they dont need to tune a room... All rooms are equal for their activities....

This is in my experience and to anyone who happens to visit there patently false.

I expect you went there and tried to tell some experts in acoustics how to do acoustics, and it was not well received. Based on your posts, it is likely you made some claims wrt what you could accomplish by ear alone that from my own audio journey is not impossible.

 

Audiophiles can’t have it both ways. You have Tony complaining that a device was not recently calibrated to a 35 year defunct Bureau of Measurements meanwhile almost no companies in this industry supply any measurements let alone NIST traceable while you claim that your ears are "accurate" enough. Surely you see the irreconcilable issue here?

 

With this truncated quotation of my post , anybody can think that i spoke about EVERYONE on ASR and not about a "few bullys"...For sure...

You quoted my COMPLETE post ONLY  after my 2 answering posts about your insinuation, thanks....

Then everybody can read my real intention clearly and your misinterpretation of my ORIGINAL post and intention ...

 

 

Deludedaudiophile, good luck with your battery venture.  You might want to learn more about metrology.  You can take some courses or learn more from the ISO or MIL Q Specs about test equipment certification and traceability.  These are industry standards and plenty of calibration labs around the country to get your test equipment calibrated and certified for a reasonable cost.  Turnaround times are pretty quick if no repairs are needed.  

@tonywinga

 

Who do you think you are fooling? Do you think people referencing 35 year defunct organizations like they still exist are taken seriously by anyone but the deluded? You need to get with reality bud no one buying your story. Throwing ISO or MIL into a sentence does not mean you know anything. If anything that you don’t reference specific standards shows you are just attempting to grandstand in the hopes someone will believe you. Those are not  standards. One is a standards body, the is just some letters. Mil spec standards are across a range of entities.

P.s. the battery venture is doing fine, it’s a good business to be in, lab budget almost unlimited but tied to profitability. Only small companies send their stuff out for calibration. The equipment we have that can be calibrated is done on site. But you wouldn’t know that.