Amir and Blind Testing

Welcoming me does not change the fact you made a false statement, that I did not take out of context.  That would near impossible given what you said, and you both will not admit to the actual words you wrote nor their meaning. I don’t perceive any ability to have a coherent honest conversation with you.

Anybody can be proven to make a false statement with any extract of words...

With this avatar name you dont seem to be of good faith if i think about it after your insult.....

Only an idiot can say that there is no acoustic expertise here in all the audiogon forum or on ASR... I am not an idiot ...This was not my point....This is explained in my last 2 posts...

You take advantage of some bad sentence out of the context of all my posts here to pick fleas in my neck...

Be it...

I never insulted you and this is a FACT ....

No distortion of my posts context will change this simple fact: to assess a product we need to listen to it in well determined acoustic condition... this is in all my posts here...You can distort this simple fact and claim that i said that there is no acoustic specialist on ASR if you want and  put that in my mouth... This is stupid claim i never did...There is acoustician here and in any other big audio sites...

This does not change the fact that most people in audio UNDERESTIMATE acoustic power concerning S.Q. improvement versus a new electronic design upgrade... This is my point...

Measuring the gear is not enough to judge 2 designs one against the other...Acoustic here is key...

it is clear even with my bad english syntax..

Welcoming me does not change the fact you made a false statement, that I did not take out of context. That would near impossible given what you said, and you both will not admit to the actual words you wrote nor their meaning. I don’t perceive any ability to have a coherent honest conversation with you.

My quote did not remove any relevant context.

Do you learned how to read? i think so if i read your posts...

Perhaps my english is not exemplary i dont doubt that...But your interpretation is not my words...

it is evident here that i spoke about SOME people on ASR not about ALL people there..

i even precisely mention a "few bullys"...

I must conclude after your insult that you have a grudge about me here because you seem too much intelligent to be unable to read the context..Who are you then? you are new here, and i welcome you, and you picked one of my post, misread it in an evident way and you go on after me... Comical...

For example in my post  , "their common point"; "their" refer to whom here?

it refer to the "few bullys"...not to the ASR site in his totality...

Anybody read that clearly in my post and not your distorted interpretation...

I know you are clever, then what i must conclude?

I even said many times here and in this post that Amirm was polite and honest then what?

There is only 2 possibilities you have a grudge against me but i dont know you then i must conclude to your bad faith...

Sorry but i refuse to think that you cannot know how to read a text like an idiot..You are not an idiot, you are evidently very intelligent... Then you quoted me in bad faith...For whatever reason i dont know...

Are you one of the few bullys on ASR?

your choice of name for your avatar goes in this interpretative direction...

It is the first time someone insult me here AFTER i welcome him on another thread where he was attacked...Comical...

😁😊

«

They are many pompuous very clever but closed minds ignoring anything resembling a listening experiments but Amir was polite...There are good people also there listen me right but they are dominated by a minority of bullys protecting the master...They are easy to recognized, some come here ridiculizing anyone who listen with his ears... Their common point is a total ignborance of acoustic condition because they need electrical tools they dont need to tune a room... All rooms are equal for their activities...»

This is your first post criticizing me with a TRUNCATED sentence from my original post :

With this truncated extract everyone can think rightfully so that i speak badly about ALL PEOPLE participating in ASR forum...

@mahgister

 

I understood quite clearly what you posted. You without any lack of clarity accused the users of the Audio Science site of ignorance wrt the need for room acoustic treatment. I will post it again.

Their common point is a total ignborance of acoustic condition because they need electrical tools they dont need to tune a room... All rooms are equal for their activities....

This is in my experience and to anyone who happens to visit there patently false.

I expect you went there and tried to tell some experts in acoustics how to do acoustics, and it was not well received. Based on your posts, it is likely you made some claims wrt what you could accomplish by ear alone that from my own audio journey is not impossible.

 

Audiophiles can’t have it both ways. You have Tony complaining that a device was not recently calibrated to a 35 year defunct Bureau of Measurements meanwhile almost no companies in this industry supply any measurements let alone NIST traceable while you claim that your ears are "accurate" enough. Surely you see the irreconcilable issue here?

With this truncated quotation of my post , anybody can think that i spoke about EVERYONE on ASR and not about a "few bullys"...For sure...

You quoted my COMPLETE post ONLY  after my 2 answering posts about your insinuation, thanks....

Then everybody can read my real intention clearly and your misinterpretation of my ORIGINAL post and intention ...