Sound/music is caused by vibrations.
I don't want to beat a dead horse but I'm bugged.
I just can't clear my head of this. I don't want to start a measurements vs listening war and I'd appreciate it if you guys don't, but I bought a Rogue Sphinx V3 as some of you may remember and have been enjoying it quite a bit. So, I head over to AVS and read Amir's review and he just rips it apart. But that's OK, measurements are measurements, that is not what bugs me. I learned in the early 70s that distortion numbers, etc, may not be that important to me. Then I read that he didn't even bother listening to the darn thing. That is what really bugs me. If something measures so poorly, wouldn't you want to correlate the measurements with what you hear? Do people still buy gear on measurements alone? I learned that can be a big mistake. I just don't get it, never have. Can anybody provide some insight to why some people are stuck on audio measurements? Help me package that so I can at least understand what they are thinking without dismissing them completely as a bunch of mislead sheep.
- ...
- 368 posts total
Now look about the subject matter, especially the link between fractal time programming and music and sound... It is amazing that a poster here , an alleged physicist, instead of discussing science want to put me with the audiophile subjectivist fetichist crowd, after i clearly demonstrated that i am not one...Is it because he is an objectivist zealot himself ? i dont know... His image of a "dead horse" against my posting mean what? Why not thanking me for an interesting post about the new meaning of "sound" in the brain and in the cosmos instead ? If it take me minutes to undertstand the matter around Anirban Bandyopadhyay discovery, without being a physicist, why a patented physicist will be losing time in a so stupid alternative as O versus S ? i dont understand...Enlighten me here please ... Anyway look at the image here called " the last machine of mankind"...Where Non Turing programming is resumed in one image...
What is a "sound" now ? Think about that? What is music? No not only a vibration sorry, a time fractal crystal, not a spatial fractal, a time-like one...Remember we called music a sound who convey a MEANING for the ears/brain/body... If you need a clue Anirban Bandyopadhyay articles will give you the story... His work encompassed Karl Friston work, the last time i was amazed so much by a scientific research theory was years ago... My job was teaching students how to read books by the way...Yes we must learn how to read like we must learn how to listen sound in a room... My first rule teaching reading was to read a book about any field and another book about any other field and discover the relation between the two... What is the relation between prime numbers and music: read Alain Connes and Anirban Bandyopadhyay in the same day... Ok i feel lonely since i retired , i miss the students... None of the students i know will oppose so narrowingly, O and S , to understand sound experience...None....I dont speak with fetichist and with zealots... I prefer to think.... And instead of argument i dont post like people on facebook a cartoon.... https://asynsis.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/amsterdam-16th-jan-lecture-debate1.pdf
|
I cannot resist to post this very deep and beautiful sentence:
«The topology of silence holds the actual information of biology and also in every complex system integrating the information of the universe.» it is in the article i posted above...If you want to understand this sentence read the article... A clue: «We do it every day, it was not just part of science, how? For example, somebody asks you ‘What are you doing?’, you say ‘Nothing’ (peaceful tone), you could say ‘Nothing’ (furious tone) or you could say ‘Nothing’ (dreamy tone), so N-O-T-H-I-N-G, seven ‘ticks’ are there, but you change the time gap between the letters to give a completely different kind of meaning to another path. So your information is not hidden in the ‘tick’, it is hidden in the silence.» Amazing mind! Link all this to the non Turing programming described in the image above....
By the way, only this remark hold the key to the linguistic theory about the relation between phonetic and phonology.... I am interested by the musical origin of language hypothesis... 😁😊
«When we say clock inside the clock inside the clock inside the clock inside the clock, then we simply say that no event in the universe could be expressed as a sequence of simple events. It’s not possible. Because they are 3D geometric shapes, events are connected one inside another topologically, connections are undefined, you cannot make an equation. So if you want to convert it into a straight line, as events happening one after another, you will not be able to do so, because you are losing the topological information of the geometric structure. This is where we actually challenge the very foundation of the information theory existing for the last century.»
|
Thank God engineers are mostly using geometric shapes like triangular diode symbols, and circular summing junctions.
The “beating of a dead horse”, is starting to resemble a Pegasus, or the winged horse that Rushdie mentioned in his “Satanic Versus” book.
Or the geometry is resembling something out of the “Three Body Problem” books, where a subatomic partial is unfolded in dimensionality.
They sound great in literary prose… |
- 368 posts total