stevewharton,
Good question.
The transport and streaming sound virtually the same, with maybe sometimes a slightly better definition with the transport. But it’s very close on most tracks.
Almost equality
Through much trial and error, and with help from this forum, I’ve finally got a digital system that compares to my analog setup. I never thought it possible, and I know there are those who say it’s impossible. And, of course, I’m comparing my unique systems to each other. YMMV.
My digital setup includes a Cambridge streamer with Qobuz and Idagio, a Cyrus transport and a Benchmark DAC . This all feeds into a re-capped vintage Conrad Johnson preamp (PV 11) and a Benchmark amplifier.
‘The analogue setup includes a heavily modified Rega RP3 turntable with two power units, and Clearaudio Virtuoso cartridge.
I’m really happy with the sound of both digital and analog for the first time, with analog having the slight edge.
- ...
- 35 posts total
@rvpiano Yeah, it's the Horenstein performance. I also have it on a Unicorn double-LP. The Unicorn pressing is much quieter but the Nonesuch pressing has much more dynamics, tone and life. What can I say? I'd rather withstand the warps, clicks and pops than tolerate the Unicorn's politeness. |
As one whos' feet are in both ponds so to speak, both have their charms. Mho comes down to what one prefers and/or willing to pursue. Each have their own characteristics determined by ones' means to do so. What may sound lovely with one may be pancake flat with the other. Some do it for the music, others the process; I like a balance in my approach. ;) |
- 35 posts total